5 All-Time-Classic Albums That Critics Despised

As much as people like to deny it, there is something about a negative album review that can sway the public consciousness. A bad review in the right publication can seal an album’s fate as a bargain bin throwaway before it even has a chance. Often times, the harsh criticism is more than warranted. Not everything can be a gem. But every once in awhile, the critics get it wrong. Horribly, horribly wrong. For example…

  • 5. Gene Clark – No Other

    No Other was former Byrds songwriter Gene Clark’s masterpiece. Released in 1974, the album was a departure from the stark acoustic sounds of his previous, relatively unsuccessful, solo records. Everything was lined up for No Other to be a commercial breakthrough. Clark had spent over a year working on the songs before recording them. He was signed to Asylum Records, at the time an absolute breeding ground for successful singer-songwriter types. The album should have been huge.

    Back Then…

    The response to No Other from critics was less like Clark delivered a bad album and more like he delivered the anti-christ. The album made extensive use of overdubs and studio techniques to produce a sound that was foreign to most listeners. Because of this, the album was decried as bloated, pretentious and overproduced. But when Fleetwood Mac employed the same studio and performance techniques a year later on their self-titled album (and on the follow up, Rumours) it was hailed as a masterpiece. Gene Clark was unfortunately a bit ahead of his time. In 1976, No Other was deleted and would not be released again for almost 25 years. The fallout all but destroyed Clark’s career.

    And Now…

    These days, No Other is almost universally hailed as a lost treasure. There is some debate about Clark’s state of mind during the writing and recording of the album. Depending on who you ask, he was either tripping on mescaline the whole time or he was stone sober. Whatever the case, Clark’s newfound experimentalism made for the most compelling work of his career. The songs themselves, when taken as individual parts, aren’t in and of themselves Clark’s best ever. He was the strongest songwriter in The Byrds and there is some absolute gold out there. But as a cohesive piece of work, No Other is undeniably epic and absolutely essential listening.

  • 4. The Rolling Stones – Exile On Main St.

    The Rolling Stones Exile On Main St. is an epic roots-rock goldmine. It features some of their most beloved hits ever (“Tumblin’ Dice,” “Sweet Virginia,” “Happy”) and a ton of lesser known gems (“Rocks Off,” “Torn and Frayed”). Listening to it now, it’s hard to imagine there was a time when it wasn’t absolutely adored by everybody. But you’d be surprised.

    Back Then…

    Commercially, Exile… was a smash right out of the gates. But the critical response was far less enthusiastic. It was viewed as a bloated, ragged record that found the Stones resting on their laurels and not challenging the listener with anything new. Some even accused the band of just replaying the same song 18 different ways. Basically, Exile… was seen as a placeholder. In the words of Rolling Stone reviewer Lenny Kaye, “the great Stones album of their mature period is yet to come.”

    And Now…

    In the years since its initial chilly critical reception, Exile On Main St. has grown considerably in status. The fans always loved it, but the critics eventually came around also. Pick a greatest-albums-of-all-time list and there is a good chance you’ll find Exile… on it. In 1998, Q Magazine ranked it number 42 on their list of the greatest albums of all time. Even Rolling Stone, as they are often apt to do, went back on their initial dismissal of the record. On their list of the 500 greatest albums of all time, Exile On Main St. was number seven.

  • 3. The Ramones – The Ramones

    It’s almost impossible to accurately state what kind of influence The Ramones have had on, not just punk, but popular music in general. They were punk before anyone knew what it was. Their songs, almost always less than three minutes long, emphasized raw rock power and feeling and fun over technical proficiency. And people ate it up. Eventually.

    Back Then…

    The initial reaction to The Ramones music was, basically, non existent. Their debut album didn’t even crack the Billboard top 100. As for the critics, reviews tended to be neutral at best, if the album was even reviewed at all. With most everything else on this list, you can dig up some vintage reviews to get a feel for what people thought back then. A vintage Ramones review, on the other hand, is hard to come by. Lester Bangs dug them though. Take that for whatever you will.

    And Now…

    It’s common knowledge these days that The Ramones debut stands as one of the most pivotal moments in music history. It’s pointless to try and run down all of the ways that record has influenced modern music. When the topic turns to greatest punk records ever, it’s rarely mentioned outside the top five. On Rolling Stone Magazine’s now infamous list of the top 500 records ever, The Ramones clocked in at number 33. That’s some rarefied air.

  • 2. Black Sabbath – Paranoid

    Not every band can claim to be responsible for starting an entire genre of music. But when it comes to the pioneers of heavy metal, it’s hard to argue against Black Sabbath. On Paranoid, their second album, the band unleashed some of their greatest songs ever. “Iron Man,” “War Pigs,” “Paranoid,” it’s all pretty deadly stuff. And in the midst of hippie movement, a band that represented something completely different was bound to appeal to a lot of people. Right?

    Back Then…

    Absolutely they did. Black Sabbath’s first two albums were commercial smashes. Unfortunately, none of those buyers worked for music magazines. The rock media was unspeakably harsh when it came to Black Sabbath, dismissing them in some cases as “bubblegum satanists.” Ouch. In Nick Tosches’ Rolling Stone review from 1971, he spends about 1,500 words dismissing the band while not once mentioning their name, the album or any of the songs on the album. No bias there, folks.

    And Now…

    You don’t need me to tell you that Paranoid is one of the greatest metal albums ever. You already know that. Everybody knows it. But if you don’t, let today’s rock critics tell you. AllMusic’s Steve Huey sums it up best…”Paranoid defined the sound and style of heavy metal more than any other record in rock history.” Even Vibe Magazine, generally known for covering rap and R&B music, included Paranoid on their list of essential albums of the 20th century. Word.

  • 1. Weezer – Pinkerton

    Weezer’s Pinkerton was recorded in the midst of a lot of personal turmoil, and it shows. Lead singer Rivers Cuomo had just undergone painful leg surgery that not only affected the way the songs were written (everything is written in first position on the guitar, so he didn’t have to move much) but also the emotion that came through in the songs. Departing from the power pop of their debut, Pinkerton was a deeply confessional, dark, abrasive masterpiece. But far be it from anyone to think so at the time.

    Back Then…

    I understand, putting Weezer ahead of the like of The Rolling Stones and Black Sabbath on this list may seem like blasphemy. But hear me out. With every other album on this list, there was at least someone who liked it, even if it was just the artist that made it. Not so with Pinkerton. Critics hated it, fans hated it, and in subsequent interview, even Rivers Cuomo claimed he hated it. In time, everyone would change their mind, making Pinkerton the biggest critical about face in history. I hate to keep bringing up Rolling Stone, but seriously, it’s not my fault they’re wrong all the time. Their initial review of Pinkerton was unspeakably cruel, reviewer Rob O’Connor calling the songwriting “juvenile.” Readers of the magazine would eventually get in on the act, voting Pinkerton as the second worst album of 1996. Also released in 1996:

  • Kenny G, The Moment
  • Celine Dion, Falling Into You
  • REO Speedwagon, Building the Bridge
  • Bryan Adams, 18 ’til I Die
  • Hootie and The Blowfish, Fairweather Johnson

I’m not sure what album the readers of Rolling Stone ranked as THE worst of 1996, but even if was one of the five listed above, it still means that they preferred the other four to Pinkerton. Swish that around in your head for a bit.

Eventually Rivers Cuomo got in on the Pinkerton bashing calling it, among other things, “a hideous record.”

And Now…

The reversal of fortune that eventually came Pinkerton’s way was absolutely unprecedented. It is generally regarded as not just Weezer’s finest moment, but one of the essential albums of the 1990′s. It started with a sort of cult following amongst Weezer fans that found its legs on the internet. Initially, the fallout from the initial Pinkerton disaster sent Rivers Cuomo into relative seclusion. It was only after seeing the sustained sales and acclaim amongst diehard fans for his band’s opus that he finally re-entered the music business. He would eventually go on record as saying that “Pinkerton’s great.”

And then there is Rolling Stone and their readers. In an adorable slice of revisionist history, Rolling Stone gave Pinkerton a new review, a rating of 5 stars out of 5, and inducted it into the Rolling Stone Hall of Fame, whatever the hell that is. The readers would eventually go on to vote it as the 16th best album…ever. Kenny G.’s The Moment was voted the 15th best album ever.

Just joking.

  • http://www.21gunstudios.com Adam

    Weezer is one of my favorite bands, and after hearing time and time again that Pinkerton got a bad rap, I was HOPING you would put it at #1, and that was a justified move. I’ve never seen such a turn-around in my life, and I LOVED Pinkerton when I first got it…I never understood why people despised it so much. It’s more angst-ridden than Blue, and no less juvenile than Nirvana (I don’t mind starting a comment war by saying that). But yeah, great list.

  • http://uk-tv-guide.com TV Guide

    The Ramones FTW

  • http://URL(Optional) jack

    led zeppelin lll would have been good for this list.

  • http://URL(Optional) joe

    Pinkerton was outstanding. I wish they would have kept moving in that direction. (even though they’re still a good band.)

  • http://URL(Optional) Stephen

    You forgot like every Led Zeppelin record which got bashed by Rolling Stone upon first release. Also, one of the cream albums got bashed by Rolling Stone which led to Clapton getting upset and helped speed up the end of the band.

  • http://einein.rejuvenatetour.com/ mk182

    Hit+

  • http://URL(Optional) Tim

    I came here with the same expectations as Adam, and I was not let down. I loved Pinkerton, its in my top 10 albums, I never knew it was panned by critics until 4 years after its release. All my friends listened to it and we just assumed every one else did too.

  • http://www.colortreemedia.com pdub

    yeah – great list. It would also be cool to see the best reviewed albums that sucked ass. But, that list would be very long.

  • http://indianstallion.blogspot.com Indian Stallion

    I would say another album deserving of the list was Jawbreaker’s major label debut Dear You. Released during the grunge craze, it was quickly dismissed and forgotten (although I remember me and another friend were listening to it non-stop). Now it is considered a classic by a lot of punk fans, so much so that they were paying around 100 USD for the original pressings of the album (it went out of print quickly due to really poor sales) on ebay, before it was re-issued.

  • http://sonicfrog.net sonicfrog

    What, Toto 4 didn’t make the list?…. Oh, nevermind, wrong list.

    PS. I’m a Toto fan, but would never say any album was a masterpiece. Musicianship-wise, some of the individual songs fantastic – Hydra, Roseanna, Africa – and I’m a HUGE fan or Steve Lukather and especially the late Jeff Porcaro.Their big weakness has always been in the lyrics department.

  • http://URL(Optional) weyoun vorta

    Ramones-Ramones!
    I never heard such a simple thing with that intensity! I mean, after an hour I played the whole album on drums, guitar and bass. it took a while to remember all the lyrics :-)
    THE BEST EVER

  • http://URL(Optional) Dylan Farnum

    The one album I totally expected to see on here was “Berlin” by Lou Reed. Following the success of “Transformer,” “Berlin” took on a much more depressing outlook and message, with songs dealing with suicide, domestic violence, and prostitution. It was a critical flop that gained a wide fan base and appreciation over time. In fact, Lou Reed just released a live album and movie of him performing the songs with a full orchestra behind him. It’s simply fantastic and one of my favorite albums of all time.

  • http://URL(Optional) RadioFloyd

    I’m happy with the #1 pick. By far one of my favorite albums ever. No comment war shall be started with me I will say that. I was a fan of it from the first moment… I remember not seeing much about it on t.v. but listened to it constantly and still do. The album has its share of “pop” songs on it… but the majority of the album is personal for River. That in my opinion is what makes an album.

  • http://URL(Optional) Jason Kingston

    Pinkerton is probably best album ever recorded.

  • http://www.everydayplayground.net Christer

    I remember the first time I bought Pinkerton. I was 16 years and had just moved away from home. The local recordstore had just recived that weeks new albums. When I saw the new Weezer album Pinkerton, with the amazing coverart of Hiroshige, I thought to myself that this might be an ok album. Since then I have destroyed at least 3 or 4 Pinkerton albums. Not because I hate the album. But simply because I wear them out.

    These days Weezer is an ok band, a bit boring, but ok. Pinkerton will never the less be one of the best albums of all times.

  • http://URL(Optional) TD

    Pinkerton is the only Weezer album that I would buy again if my collection was stolen. By far their greatest achievement to date.

  • http://URL(Optional) Eric

    I’ll second Adam. I loved Pinkerton when it came out, and the negative press, to me, seemed like people who got into “Buddy Holly” could not stand the more raw, less produced sound and even intent of Pinkerton. Not to mention, it’s a rock record based (extremely) loosely around an opera. Thanks for the cool list on a great topic!

  • http://URL(Optional) Jeff

    Thank you for recognizing the greatness of Pinkerton, and also for recognizing just how wrong Rolling Stone was. Mr. O’Connor must have been listnening to something else when he wrote his review. And seriously, the 2nd worst album of 1996??!! Unbelievable. It’s funny that everyone later came back to their senses to proclaim it to be as great as it always was. To this day my favorite Weezer album and quite possibly my favorite album of all time.

  • http://URL(Optional) Tom

    what about the velvet underground? they were highly hated so much so that on there album they printed a lot of the bad reviews that they got, and now they are considered a pioneer in music

  • http://www.musicsmania.com/ Lyrics Ringtones

    Exile on Main Street was class!! Most of it was done whilst partying and getting wrecked in the South of France with a few mademoiselles around for company!!

  • http://URL(Optional) djalicat

    pinkerton is my favorite weezer album…i loved it when it came out and still love it now!

    let’s not forget that beastie boys ‘paul’s boutique’ was panned too! it was such a departure (at the time) from ‘license to ill’ that everyone freaked out. i now consider it to be the first real beastie boys album as most of their music has more in common with ‘paul’s boutique’ than with ‘license to ill’.
    now everyone claims that it’s their favorite beastie boys album…btw it’s not mine it’s my least favorite my fave is ‘ill communication’.

  • http://URL(Optional) Seth

    When I first heard Weezer’s “El Scorcho” I fell in love. Not only because I also share River’s Asian fetish, but the song traveled from a light bouncing groove to a driving anthem that every outcast wished they could say to that one dream girl. “Pinkerton” was different (and that never goes well with critics and shallow fans) but it retained the same excellent song writing trading in the bubble gum of their first album for a mouthful of jerky.

  • http://www.tsheets.com Time Tracker

    I’d also drop Prince’s 3 disc Emancipation collection to this list. Panned by critics, but featuring some of Prince’s best work to date.

    • http://twitter.com/michaeldermot Michael Dermot

      Nope. That album is just as awful as it was in 1996.

  • Pingback: Linkblog for Nov 08 to Nov 15 @ Unreality Music

  • Armchair critic

    It’s annoying when people cherry pick from reviews to make a point. That’s dishonest. Rolling Stone’s original review of Pinkerton was hardly a pan. Rob O’Connor didn’t love the album, but he liked it. He gave it three stars. That means “good.” One star is poor, two is fair, three is good, four is excellent and five is classic.

    Also, to say Lenny Kaye represented “Rolling Stone” in his review of “Exile” is, well, puerile. It represents a fundamental misunderstanding of critical analyses. A critic for Rolling Stone (or Spin, or Vibe, or whatever) doesn’t necessarily represent the likes or dislikes of “The Magazine.” He or she is (or should be) simply a professional giving his or her educated opinion of an album. His or her educated opinion might differ from that of another critic. It would be boring if album reviews represented the likes and dislikes of “The Magazine” instead of those of a particular critic.

    It is not contradictory, in any way, for Rolling Stone or any other magazine to publish a critic’s three-star (or one-star) review upon an album’s release and then come back and have another critic give it five stars. It’s not even contradictory for a specific critic to give album album four stars upon its release and then, after seeing the staying power of that album, to come back later and give it five stars, for “classic.”

    There certainly is such a thing as “critical consensus.” For an accurate list of albums that were critically panned, you would have to gather lots of reviews from different sources, as metacritic.com does. That’s how magazines come up with lists like “The Top 100 Albums of All time.” Those lists DO represent the likes and dislikes of “The Magazine,” because for them, the editors gather their critics and come up with a “critical consensus.” You could have done the same thing here, and you kind of did. But because of your dishonest citations about Pinkerton, it’s hard to take the substance of your list seriously.

  • Pingback: 20-something/f/chicago « Kay-tee Ah-Vee-Luh

  • runnersdialzero

    Not everything on Pinkerton was written in ‘first position’ please amend your original post.

    • http://adriantry.com Adrian Try

      Hi Runnersdialzero – thanks for your post. You haven’t given me a big reason to amend the post.
      I don’t have any personal knowledge of Pinkerton myself, but a quick Google search shows that the Weezerpedia certainly disagrees with you. http://weezerpedia.com/wiki/index.php?title=Pinkerton

      • runnersdialzero

        OK, Let’s break this down very, very clearly so a ‘journalist’ like you who gets their info from Wiki and Weezer pedia. Hell, I’ll even break it down song by song. I’ll even do journalistic type things like provide where I got my information from.

        As a preface, Rivers Cuomo had his leg surgery on April 15, 1995

        ‘Tired of Sex’ was written on Saturday, 12/03/1993, almost 2 years before his leg surgery. He certainly wasn’t precluded from writing in other positions due to both legs being healthy.

        ‘Getchoo’ was written in January 1994, same as above, both of his legs were plenty healthy enough to afford him the ability to not be confined to write in ‘first position’ only.

        ‘No Other One’ was written on Thursday, July 17th, 1994. read above (this is getting weird)

        ‘Why Bother?” was written on Monday, March 13, 1994. …read above (weird)

        I can’t speak for the rest, but, as an observation, I’d bet Rivers was fully healthy by June 96 when he wrote “Butterfly” so add that one to the list just because he was probably healthy 15 months after surgery. So, in conclusion, 4 songs were most definitely written in first position (Across the Sea, Good Life, El Scorcho, Pink Triangle)

        Oh yeah I forgot, ‘Falling for You’ was written on 3/20/1996, he certainly was probably healthy enough, almost a year after surgery, to be able to write in other positions. S please amend your post. ;)

        source: http://weezerpedia.com/catalogofriffs.html

      • http://adriantry.com Adrian Try

        Hi again runnersdialzero

        I won’t be amending the post, but I will let your comments stand, and let our readers make up their own minds.

        Your ‘journalist’ crack is entertaining. I didn’t write this article – it was written years ago! I don’t know who you are, and you made a claim that the article was wrong. I’m not just going to believe you (you gave no proof or explanation), but felt it was important to check out the issue. I did a quick Google Search and couldn’t find anyone who agreed with you. Even the Weezerpedia disagrees. That’s not bad journalism, it’s just quick evidence I shouldn’t take you too seriously.

        Hey, for someone who disrespects Weezerpedia, you sure quote from it a lot! Thanks again for your comments. I’m glad you enjoy Pinkerton.

        Adrian

  • runnersdialzero

    please pardon my few editing mistakes, didn’t proof read. :)

  • The Goober

    Everyone, in fact, didn’t hate Pinkerton!

    Spin: Who were you most surprised to find was a Pinkerton fan?

    RC: It’s interesting because in 1996, when it was totally not cool to like the record, there was one musician who stood up and said they loved it. That was Russell Simmons from the Jon Spencer Blues Explosion. And that was totally shocking to me — they were like the coolest possible thing at the time. All year, that record had criticism heaped on it and to have one of the coolest musicians on the scene say he liked it — it was one faint glimmer of praise in a sea of criticism. It made me feel so good.

    http://www.spin.com/articles/rivers-cuomo-theres-so-much-pain-my-voice

    you should try googling before writing an article. it helps!

  • Ihop

    Have you actually read the first Rolling Stones review of Pinkerton? It got 3/5 stars – not what it deserves, but not terrible. And it spent as much time praising it as it did poking holes in it. For example, it called it “great jangly pop,” said that “‘Butterfly’ is a real treat,” and said that Cuomo “is an artist well on his way to maturity.” You have to admit, those lyrics are not mature, at least not in the typical sense of lyrical maturity. That’s precisely what makes them so lovable and timeless.
    Pinkerton didn’t sell as well as Blue, but it did reach #19 in the US charts. I love Weezer, but even I took a few listens to understand and appreciate the album as a whole. I still find new ways that the lyrics run together between songs. But it’s so brutally honest, it takes a while to get into.
    The greatest album turn-around in history has been blown way out of proportion – hyperbole that does make it a better story :)

  • Pingback: Is Weezer’s Pinkerton the Greatest Emo Album of All Time? | Absinthe and Kind Hearted Landlords

  • Anon

    Just so you know, Bush’s Razorblade Suitcase was named Worst Album of 1996 on that list.

  • Pingback: Personal Choice Blog 1-Why?/History with the Album « cbennetmassmedia

  • Kumar

    The Ramones was my favorite, especially “I wanna be sedated”. I love it.