6 Different Frequencies and How to Spot Them

6 Different Frequencies and How to Spot Them

Tutorial Details
  • Difficulty: Intermediate
  • Time: 20-30 minutes
  • Requirements: Any DAW

I can never get enough information on EQ. I love to know how everybody EQed a certain vocal or drum sound to get that tight punch or shimmering highs so prominent in a mix. When you’ve mastered the EQ spectrum and you know where to go when you need to fix or embellish something, you are definitely ahead of the game.

If you can listen to a sound and say to yourself, “Oh that needs a little more 250 Hz,” or “I think a cut at 1.2 would totally do the trick,” then you have something to be proud of. You are hearing something that nobody else around you hears. And that’s something to be proud of.

There are sometimes reoccurring themes in audio engineering; certain frequencies pop up more frequently than others. If you can grasp where you will find these following six frequencies then you can definitely make your life easier, and your production faster.


Frequency 1 – Thickness/Muddiness

Instruments and sounds that are dominant in the lower frequencies can have a tendency to dominate them a little too much. Too much low mid can thicken up a sound so that it lacks clarity and definition. The low mids, around 200 Hz are a good area to check for any unwanted muddiness or boominess in your mixes.

Listen to this double bass that has a little too much of 215 Hz, resulting in a thick sound that might sound cool on its own but will definitely clutter up the low end spectrum.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Backing off the low mids with some EQ cuts at the same area we now have a bass line that’s just as juicy without the unnecessary muddiness.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.


Frequency 2 – Boxiness

This is the bane of the bass drum. I personally hate kick drums that have too much of that cardboard box flavor. If it’s done 100% right it does have a natural earthy flavor that’s kind of cool but just a little bit too much can kill the sound for me. It just sounds like a fist pounding a cardboard box.

If you are struggling with boxiness then the frequency area around 3–600 Hz should be your hunting ground. Boost your EQ all the way up and stop when the boxiness is unbearable. Then swiftly cut down the middle. Don’t worry if your cut isn’t super narrow, it’s OK to cut the kick drum a little more drastically in that area.

Take a listen to the kick drum in the following example. Notice how much thicker and rounder the bass drum gets when you cut the annoying boxiness out of the way.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.


Frequency 3 – The Cheap Sound

This is a very annoying frequency for acoustic guitar players that also happen to be engineers. Like me. You know when the guitar just doesn’t sound good. It just sounds like somebody bought it at Wal-Mart and brought it to the studio expecting a great sound. Ok, that might not actually happen but sometimes some guitars just sound cheap.

Obviously this can’t be fixed all the time. But there is a cheap cheat frequency that you can use to get rid of at least some it. The mids around 800 Hz have this characteristic that makes the acoustic guitar sound a little cheap. So by cutting it a little bit you can usually bring out a warmer and less biting sound.

Listen to the audio below. The first run through of the chord progression is just a normal sounding acoustic guitar but the second run through I have cut the 800 Hz with a narrow cut. It brings out the natural sound of the guitar and gets rid of some of that brittle sound.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.


Frequency 4 – Nasal Sound

It sucks to record a singer when he has a cold. Not to mention the possibility of catching it yourself but your recording will too. What’s even worse is when your singer doesn’t have a cold but he somehow sounds like he does.

Nasally or tinny sound can be a product of too much of 1–1.2 kHz. Too much in that area and your instruments sound horn-like and tinny and your singers sound nasally and congested. If you feel like you have a vocal that’s suffering from the aforementioned symptoms then make sure you check to see if a cut in the 1 kHz area can’t help.

Listen to how the vocal clears up in the second part of this chorus. By cutting away the nasally 1.1 kHz I’ve made the vocal much clearer and nicer.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.


Frequency 5 – Presence

If I had to pick between the frequencies for a favorite one (which sounds ridiculous but whatever), I would have to choose 5 kHz. 5 kHz just brings out the character in so many instruments. Whether you need to put some make-up on a dull vocal or bring out the bite on the electric guitar, 5 kHz just really makes it all shine.

For instance, in the audio sample below I have a super basic organ part that sounds kind of dull and might need to be brought more in the mix. Just a little boost at 5 kHz is all it needs. And you can really hear the waves of the leslie in the background too.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.


Frequency 6 – Air

That final stretch of spectrum from around 10 kHz and up is sometimes referred to as Air. As you might think from the name it kind of lifts up the higher frequencies, opening up the instruments that occupy that part of the spectrum. The high notes of instruments, subtleties of the piano for instance or the sound of drum cymbals.

14 kHz or so onward can be used to subtly brightening things up that aren’t necessarily dull but might need a little….well, air, to make them stand out. By boosting there you are boosting frequencies out of the way of other instruments, as many instruments won’t be affected that much that high up the spectrum.

Like in the following drum loop example I’ve boosted everything with a shelving EQ at 14 kHz. Notice how the cymbals get brighter and the drum loop opens up. Additionally, listen to how the sound of the brushes are also affected to a certain extent.

Drum loop with no air.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Flying!

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.


Conclusion

I hope some of the examples above have shed some light on your endeavors in the EQ spectrum. By knowing what you are looking for and where to go after it you make your life much simpler and easier. It’s easy to cut down on muddiness if you know where it’s located in the low mids; if your vocalist sounds like the tin man it’s easy to cut that out and if you need some presence or air to your mixes it’s all possible with a few mouse clicks on the screen or twists on your equalizer.

Add Comment

Discussion 16 Comments

  1. Paul W says:

    Very useful tutorial, EQ is something that I am constantly learning and this has helped a lot.

    http://www.soundcloud.com/techstar
    http://www.minimalsystem.com

  2. fraxyl says:

    This is pretty interesting information. I think to improve on the audio examples it would be nice to have the uneffected and then repeat over with the effected rather than two separate audios or having the EQ come in half way through.

    Although, on the organ example, you can actually hear when the change comes in quite drastically.

    • Björgvin says:
      Author

      Hi Fraxyl, there are some examples where the EQ is bypasses and then turned on midway through. I guess the first and last example have separate audio files, but the 2-5 have the frequency bypassed and then turned on the second time through.

  3. loopz says:

    Thank you, Mr Benediktsson!
    Exactly as you said it:
    “I can never get enough information on EQ”

    The instrument-based reviews are very good. I guess proper compression for each of them will be the next tutorial? :]

    Cheers,
    Oliver

  4. ab says:

    thanks for this nice tut, i have read a lot of tuts about this type of frequency ranges, but they always lack the sound examples,yours have some pretty nice and clear sounding examples, thanks!

  5. SylvainB says:

    Many thanks for your tutorial.

    I agree with Fraxyl when he says that It is better to cut your examples in files (unprocessed and with EQ)

    I love this adress because I really want to improve my level in mixing.

  6. Björgvin says:
    Author

    Thank you guys. I am glad you like it. One can never get too much EQ information!

  7. yettibrad says:

    Excellent article! I myself am trying to train my ears (and brain) to focus in on frequencies to make things shine or get rid of unwanted nastiness. This is a great primer.

  8. dreksal says:

    thanks for all these tutoriaks…my “go to” place for music creation. i agree u can never have too much eq knowledge.

  9. Jan says:

    Thanks! Question: in the first example you state there’s too much 215 Hz, but the enclosed EQ setting shows a cut around 800 Hz. Just a wrong picture, or am I missing the point here?

    • Adrian Try says:
      Staff

      Well spotted Jan. The picture that went with Frequency 1 was actually for Frequency 3. I moved it earlier—probably while you were reading the tut. Thanks.

  10. Ha Nguyen says:

    Thank you! Great tutorial!

  11. Femi @ Work says:

    great tutorial!

  12. Ardiril says:

    I was really looking forward to this article, but I don’t hear any difference whatsoever in most of the examples.

  13. Chris Castig says:

    Fantastic article! Thanks a lot for putting this together

  14. With “The Cheap Sound” I thought you were going to talk about cheap built-in piezo pickups on acoustic guitars. If you’re plugging one of those straight into a passive DI or worse, the line-in on a mixing board, it’s going to sound like a tambourine when it comes out of the speakers. Usually requires some massive high frequency cuts.

Add a Comment