What is 'translation' and how does it relate to our mixes? A mix that displays good translation will play back well on a number of sound systems, with all its individual elements remaining clear and balanced. In this tutorial, we look at how you can achieve this with your own mixes.
This means that in a perfect world your final mix should 'translate' to a cheap mono radio in the kitchen as well as it does to a large club system, with every mix element just as clear and defined on both. Of course this is a difficult trick and if your track achieves good translation on 80% of the systems you test it on, you're doing pretty well.
To achieve even a passable level of translation there are a few guidelines you should try and follow. Hopefully following this tutorial will get you started and help you avoid being disappointed with your new track when you play it anywhere outside of your studio.
Step 1 - From the Top
The art of achieving good translation starts during the earliest stages of production and isn't just something that is achieved through a few tricks at mixdown. To create mixes that are really clear on a number of systems you need to really think about the elements you are putting into the project from the get-go.
Less really is more here. A track with 100 different instruments may sound great on your studio monitors in a controlled environment, but it's likely to make people's ears bleed when played back through a $10,000 live rig.
It's well worth taking a very considered approach when throwing down parts for a new track. It's not always easy in the heat of the moment, when the creative juices are flowing, but at the very least take a break when you have recorded your initial instruments, come back to the project and be ruthless about what stays and what goes.
When you have chosen the final parts that will make up the track, sculpt them carefully so they occupy their own space and are not at odds with each other. If you can achieve this during each project, half the battle is won before you even get to the final mixing and mastering stage. It's common sense but clear uncluttered mixes tend to work on more systems than mixes with huge numbers of conflicting elements.
Step 2 - Monitors and Acoustics
Before you start your mixdown or mastering, you first need to think about your monitoring situation and how accurately your mix is represented to you in your workspace. If things aren't right at this point, no matter what you do during the final stages, the end result will sound different as soon as you play it back on any other system.
The main thing you are trying to achieve here is a flat response, with minimal reflection, no standing waves, no exaggerated nodes and some controlled diffusion. If these terms are all meaningless jargon to you, you may want to delve into the subject of acoustics. There is a whole tutorial in there really (and possibly one coming up) but there is certainly plenty of reading available on the subject.

In basic terms, your room needs to be treated in some manner. Bass traps, absorption panels and diffusers are an easy way to get started here and companies such as Auralex supply some great products and guidelines on how you should go about treating your space. If you're after a cheaper option check out newer companies such as Universal Acoustics, or if you're brave enough you could attempt a DIY job.
Whatever you do here be aware that any treatment is better than none, so it's well worth making a start as the impact on your mixes and their translation to other situations will be immediately apparent. The main issues that people have tend to be with low end and stereo image. With this in mind a good starting point is an acoustics kit which includes bass traps and some broad band absorption panels.
Once you feel your room is treated to a satisfactory level you need to think about your monitors. If you can, make sure you are using a full range system that reproduces as much of the audible frequency range as possible. This may involve investing in a sub woofer or larger monitors but it will be worth the investment. If you are using a pair of tiny monitors to mix with, you shouldn't be surprised when your bass sounds different on a large system with sub-bass capabilities.

I often get asked if it's okay to use headphones to perform a final mixdown or master. The short answer is no. Of course, there will be some people finding success using headphones to perform their mixes but 90% of material I hear that has been mixed this way does not translate to real world listening situations. I remember that during my time working at record labels, we would always be able to spot tracks and demos that had been mixed on headphones within moments of listening.
The main problem with using headphones is that what you hear may sound perfect, with all mix elements well-balanced and just the right amount of high and low end, but in reality what you are hearing is in no way accurate. This inaccuracy is caused by the way we listen to sound from headphones. The sound is presented directly and goes straight to our ear drum, with the left and right sides and received only by the left or right ear respectively.
In a situation using monitors in a studio, the sound is subject to all sorts of reflections and diffusion before it enters our ears, and this means you hear some of the left and right side in both ears creating a realistic and accurate representation of the stereo field. Bass frequencies are also allowed to develop and build in the space of the room, and if treated correctly, this will give you an accurate picture of your low end mix.
Of course, in a world where everyone listened to music through headphones, then using them to mix and master would be totally acceptable but unfortunately this isn't the case and achieving accurate mixes that play back well everywhere requires the final mix to be performed through monitors. It's worth remembering that good mixes completed using speakers will sound good in headphones but not the other way around.

Step 3 - The Right Audio Interface
Some of you that are less experienced in the world of production may wonder how the audio interface you use is related to good mix translation but they are actually very closely related. The interface you use can have a direct result on not only the quality of your mix but how well it translates to multiple listening environments.
It really comes down to the digital to analog converters used in any particular interface. This is the component used to convert the music in your DAW from zeros and ones, to actual audio that can be heard through your monitors.
Some cheaper products will use lower quality conversion chips and this can result in colored or inaccurate representation of your overall mix. Just as with the monitors you use, if the converters in your audio interface are not telling you the whole story, creating a mix that will translate well is going to be an uphill battle.
A lot of the time you get what you pay for and the interface you choose to purchase may be directly effected by your budget. Not everyone can afford high end Apogee Rosetta or Prism converters, but the technology is certainly more affordable now than ever before. You don't have to break the bank to acquire an interface containing converters that will do your mix justice.
Companies such as Apogee, TC Electronic and Focusrite all produce entry level products, which perhaps sport less in and outs but feature really excellent sound quality. A stand out contender here is the Apogee Duet, which sports professional grade converters and preamps at a very reasonable price point. Well worth checking out.

Apogee Duet

TC Fire One

Focusrite Saffire
Step 4 - Mixdown and Mastering
The mixing and mastering phase is obviously going to be an important one when it comes to creating a mix with satisfactory translation, so it's worth taking your time here.
The trick is not to overcook things. Applying huge amounts of compression and limiting to your mix may sound great in the studio and create a mix with a high density and volume level but you have to remember that some playback systems will apply their own treatments and compression. Radio stations and live installations will apply further limiting for example. This doesn't mean you can't use some of these processes but giving your dynamics some room to breathe will ensure that your mix isn't smashed when it is put through one of these systems.
Another good tip is to treat each stage of production as separate entities. Splitting it into groups such as writing, recording, arranging, mixing and mastering can be a very healthy approach. In doing this you will take breaks and allow your ears rest between each stage and the result should be a more accurate mix. It's really not a good idea to spend a whole day writing and arranging your project at high volumes and then move straight into making critical mix decisions. Take a break or even sleep on it and come back to your mixing session refreshed and ready to make the important decisions needed for a clear balanced mix.
Step 5 - Critical Listening Sessions
Once you have the closest thing to a final mix you can get, it's time to start testing it out on more systems and some extra ears. It's well worth getting the opinion of a few people you respect before you take it out of the studio. You'll be surprised how this can bring out faults in the mix. Often you become so accustomed to something, you no longer hear it as clearly as you should. Take any criticism on the shoulders and then weigh up whether it's worth making any changes. If 10 people think the bass is too loud it's just possible that it might be!
Now you are ready to start listening to your prized final mix on other systems. In an ideal world, this would happen in the studio but not all budgets stretch to having multiple monitor set ups. You may have seen these sorts of set ups in professional studios and they are specifically designed for achieving good translation in mixes.
Assuming you haven't got three different pairs of speakers in your studio, you will have to settle with listening to your mix on as many systems as you can get access to. Try to get a varied picture by using very different test systems, such as a small mono radio, a car system, large hi-fi and a live PA if you can get your hands on one.
Obviously every system will sound very different. Remember you are just looking for a passable result on each, and it is unlikely that it will sound excellent on all of them so don't be disheartened. What you are looking for is a common thread throughout. If your low end is weak on all of them it is likely that you need to boost it, and if it sounds alright in your studio this maybe a sign of an acoustic treatment problem that needs looking at.
With the new information fresh in your mind, go back to the studio and make some subtle adjustments. Don't do anything rash and definitely try to avoid making changes based on things you have heard on one particular system. Some common sense is required here. You can now go back and forth until you have a good compromise between all the systems. Eventually you will gain enough experience and get to know your speakers well enough so that less cross checking is required to get a good result.

Plus Members
Source Files, Bonus Tutorials and
More for $9 a month for all TUTS+
sites in one subscription.















User Comments
( ADD YOURS )Nick March 4th
What a great post, thank you.
I’ve really been struggling with achieving that high quality sound, and I think I’ve narrowed most of the issue down to the fact that 1. I’m not using a mixer, I’m using a $50 Creative sound card, and 2. I always mix through my headphones, my speakers were only $100 and aren’t designed for studio sessions, and my room is not acoustically sound.
Do you think the main issue is that I am using a crappy soundcard and that I need an actual decent mixer, or that it’s something else?
And when I say I can’t achieve studio quality sound, I mean that I can make my songs sound good now, but I’ll play my song then play another song I like and it just sounds so crisp and perfect in terms of quality that I feel it’s a hardware issue holding me back.
Thanks!
( )Mo Volans March 5th
Hi Nick… lets try and address your issues one by one.
- Not using a mixer is definitely not going to hold you back when trying to achieve a clearer more defined mix. If anything the extra conversion and connections will reduce definition. The best thing you can do is upgrade your sound card and in turn your converters.
- Using headphones to perform your final mix and master will detrimentally effect your mix and is 9 times out of ten not a good move.
- When you listen to your tracks against others and hear a difference in quality this is most likely nothing to do with translation but decisions you are making in the mix and therefor a production issue.
A move in the right direction would be to invest in a decent set of monitors, some basic room treatment and a good sound card. You will then have a better idea of what is happening in your mix and then you will be equipped to start developing your production skills.
hope this helps
( )Nick March 5th
Thanks.
I will be picking up a better soundcard soon. I’ve read that M-Audio has one that is ideal for musicians as it has all the connections a mixer does as well as MIDI in/out.
Mo Volans March 5th
Thats probably the best route Nick… there are literally hundreds of soundcards / interfaces to choose from right now that totally replace the role of a traditional mixer…
Maudio are great for the price but its well worth checking out Tascam, TC electronic, Alesis, Novation, Lexicon, Focusrite etc… you maybe spoilt for choice once you start looking.
Nick March 5th
Thank you so much for the help, it’s great to be able to ask you questions and read very helpful information on here.
I’ve already made my latest song sound MUCH better by paying a lot more attention to EQ’ing and easing up on compression and reverb.
Almost sounds professional now.
Jason March 28th
The first thing I thought of when you said “but I’ll play my song then play another song I like and it just sounds so crisp and perfect in terms of quality” was noise reduction.
If you’re recording a live instrument you might be getting some extra system or room noise that is building up in each of your tracks. I use Adobe Audition which has a pretty good noise reduction filter. In the filter, you select part of the track that has no instrument sound to use as the noise definition. Apply the filter and that track should sound much cleaner.
I’m a new sound engineer, so maybe this isn’t the correct way to do things. I’d assume a good quality signal cleaner component or tweaking the input levels would help start out with a good noise-free recording.
( )Eric Shafer March 5th
Heh, if only I could afford to treat my room…and actually had my own, instead of just an apartment. Ah, the joys of college life.
Thanks for the tutorial though Mo, it’s a pretty critical topic. I’ve had several people play a mix for me in the studio, then I take it out to my car and it sounds 100x worse.
( )Umesh Persad March 5th
Good article. A tutorial on acoustics and room treatment would be great. Though there is a lot of stuff on acoustics on the net etc., it would be useful to have one with tips for addressing common problems in different rooms.
( )Mo Volans March 5th
Hi Umesh… i have one on acoustics planned for next month.
( )Umesh Persad March 6th
Excellent .. looking forward to it.
Karel March 5th
Great informative write-up! Thanks
( )Pierre March 5th
Hi! Good article, indeed. Thanks a lot
( )What program did you use to draw a bird’s eye view of the room, please?
Cheers!
Amir Ardalan March 5th
Check out Google Sketchup.
( )JohnM. March 5th
Great tips! One question though: What sound card should I use to get to be able to have near zero latency? (On a PC)
( )Mo Volans March 5th
Unfortunately near zero latency isn’t a possibility just yet… but saying that pick a high quality interface from a company with good pedigree and mature drivers and you will get as close as you can and you should see really low figures…. Try something from MOTU, Lexicon, Focusrite, TC Electronic or Tascam.
many argue that Firewire is the way to go as well (as opposed to USB).
Some sound cards offer true zero latency monitoring of sources though, using a hardware ‘through’ configuration. This means you can monitor signals being fed into the inputs, such as mics, guitars, decks etc with no delay present.
( )pugsfly March 5th
Nice write-up. Indeed there are so many things that could come into play for mixing/mastering. Some of my experience with setting up a good room for mixing/mastering includes:
1) Good environment to mix in, no point setting up a good room (but w/o soundproofing); especially if the room is next to a highway!
( )2) Good cables are important too. You can really hear some difference between cheap Radioshack cables, and say more pro-audio cables.
3) A good power-supply system with filter. You’ll be surprised how much this matter especially if you are overloading your power sockets already.
Tim Glenn March 5th
Great article. I try to listen to my mixes in the car and home stereo for adjustments. I am trying to figure out low cost methods of making my room flat. I have a big window and tile floor with an area rug.
( )Everestmindz March 5th
Thank you for this tutorial. It is very helpful.
( )Damien March 5th
Hey, thankx for the info.
for me the actual art of mixing is the hardest THING to master.
Separation from beats and vocals
surrounding the vocals
stacking the vocals
when to use compression on the master?
where levels should sit in comparison to each other.
To the previous poster!
try to go above m audio! they are still initial entry quality!
I am blown away by the Apogee DUET!!!! its amazing!!
( )Nick March 7th
Thanks. I know M-Audio isn’t considered pro, but for the price I feel it’s a nice company to start with.
I’ll check out Apogee though, and the others!
( )Damien March 5th
PS .. recording a Rap song )vocals in Logic with beats would be an awesome tutorial! as to me everything else is more logical! its like tricks! of the trade get those rap vocals!
( )Damien March 5th
ONe thing I never understood is why my mixes sound great in my DAW.
( )but when I bounce them to MP3 they lose overal DB quality?
Nick March 5th
Are all of your synths set to export at ultra-high quality?
( )Mo Volans March 5th
This could be a number of things Damien. As Nick points out it maybe your export quality or lack of dithering if you are moving from 24 to 16 bit. Make sure you are using the high quality option available and ensure there is no clipping taking place on your main out.
To be honest its better practice to export at 24 or 16 bit in an uncompressed formate (such as WAV or AIFF) then master this file and then encode to mp3 in a high qulaity app such as Peak Pro or Wavelab.
But of course all this said, you have to remember that MP3 is a compressed format, so some quality reduction is to be expected, even in the best scenario. If you are using a good encoder and are jumping through the right hoops a 320 kbps Mp3 of you final mix/master should sound pretty good though and not be worlds apart from your original DAW playback.
If you are experiencing a massive reduction in quality then its likely something else is going wrong in the process. One other culprit is often the fact people play their mp3 back in Itunes and have the enhancer turned on in prefs… this creates a different sound on playback and can cause some confusion
( )Tim Maguire March 6th
This is a really good overview of the translation process. I myself have been struggling over the past couple of months to get to the point where the final mix works on a variety of sound systems (especially in my car). I wish I had this tutorial from the beginning.
I really like your idea of reducing the amount of instruments/pieces up front. I have often waited too long in the arrange/mixing phases of production, and try to accomodate too many items, resulting in a muddy mess.
I look forward to your next tutorials.
( )discussed March 6th
If only you had posted this six months ago, you would have saved me six months of my life. Still helpful, though… You rule, Mo!
( )Mo Volans March 9th
Glad it helped and sorry it wasnt there for you last year
( )Alex March 7th
I have a low end setup for mixing, but I can achieve good results by testing out my mixdowns by listening on several sets of speaker in different settings.
( )1.) Monitors in my room
2.) car stereo
3.) ipod headphones + akg headphones.
Make sure it sounds good on all of them.
James March 9th
Great article. I was using a Mac with the built in audio routed out to an old Kenwood midrange Hi Fi system for a couple of years and I was getting good results as I had been listening to music on it for years and became used to how it sounded and how it translated.
A year ago I decided it was time to get serious, so I invested in a new MacPro, Logic Studio, a pair of Mackie MR8 monitors and an Apogee Duet, all after much research on sites likes this. The difference has been incredible, and I highly recommend all of the componenets I just mentioned. The Apogee Duet is just fantastic, really excellent sound quality in and out and works seamlessly with Logic. The detail in the sound is excellent and I’m now hearing things I never noticed before in my own recordings and in my music collection, it’s great being able to hear all the subtle mixing nuances I didn’t realise were there before!
Having said that, I still check my mixes on that old stereo, plus my car stereo, Sony enertainment system, and iPod and I also check it on my monitors in mono, which certainly highlights any problem areas.
( )Mo Volans March 9th
Hi James… yeah this is really a perfect example of how just a bit of investment can really make a world of difference.
And the point you made about checking the mixes in mono is something i really should of included. But it will certainly highlight any phase issues and will give you a good idea of how the mix will translate once summed to a mono system.
( )pg-13 March 10th
when i first got actual studio monitors, my mixes improved DRAMATICALLY! These were some mid priced Event monitors, and were decent. Years later I then purchased a MOTU soundcard (828) and upgraded to Mackie 824 monitors. Another big leap forward in my mixes. The Mackies were also easier on the ears and I can mix at lower volumes now as well. Remember, if you can’t hear what you are doing, because your monitors suck, then it wont matter how good your ear is.
Also, leave some headroom in your mix for mastering because if you do your end result will sound bigger.
( )Garry Webb March 11th
This is a really valuable readm thanks
( )Ben March 12th
One important built-in mixer question from a beginner in pro equipment using to Mo or somebody who knows…
If I had Motu Ultralite instead of my Soundlaster , how should I use this built-in mixer ? Each channel from Cubase should go to a different track to MOTU , right ? And then what ? How can I control them ? All the tracks are going to my monitors through what ? Some aonther real mixer ? What control device should I use to control buil-in audio interface mixer ?
Actually all above is ONE question in parts
. I hope you know what I mean, I just have no idea how to use built-in mixer.
( )Mo Volans March 12th
Hi Ben… i think you have misunderstood the whole concept of mixing ‘in the box’ or going mixer-less so to speak.
Its simply a case of mixing your entire track using the mixer in Cubase, all the summing is done internally and the only outputs you need to hear are two stereo outs… these are fed directly to your powered monitors or monitor controller.
Of course if you really want to you can use the multiple outputs on any sound card or interface to feed your stems to an analog mixer but it isnt mandatory by any means. The internal mixer in a MOTU for example really becomes useful when you need to monitor sources you are recording.
The advantage of using a better interface is not really its built in mixer but the superior sound quality supplied by better conversion chips. This will give you a clearer picture of what is happening in your mix and allow you to make better decisions.
hope this helps??
( )Ben March 22nd
Mo! Thx for you Re!
I would like to use MOTU but I would like to have a real mixer/controler on my desk also. What mixer should I choose ?
If I have good mixer in MOTU, I don’t need another anlog mixer, right ?
I need only the knobs and sliders controler ?
can you give me some good examples of this kind of devices ?
Thanks you are here man!
Mo Volans March 22nd
Hi again Ben… yeah MOTU make some great products and their software mixer and interface is truly excellent.
Try picking up a Mackie control Universal to use as a controller. This will control both the mixer in your chosen DAW and the MOTU mixer. If you go for the original midi model you can pick up some real bargains on ebay. They have really high quality flying faders and are built like tanks too ! really solid piece of kit, although they do take up some desk space.
Ben March 23rd
Hey Mo!
Thx a LOT fot your Re:
Are there 2 different version of mackie ctrl universal ?
The new one and the old one ?
Which one will handle both – my MOTU and my ABLETON mixer ?
I understand, that to control my internal MOTU mixer I need to use MIDI connection , right ?
Thanks agian.
Mo Volans March 23rd
Yep there is two version of the MCU the older version and the new Pro version… they are pretty in operation and build to be honest. The new version has a few improvements, such as a tilted display and better jog wheel but the main difference is that the newer version uses a direct USB connection as its interface rather than MIDI sockets. This makes connection to your computer much easier.
Both versions will control both your DAW and MOTU software mixer. When you switch from your DAW to the MOTU mixer the faders and display will just flip… I know this as one of my previous studios had this set up and it worked well.
Hope this helps?
Ben March 26th
Ofcourse it helped!
THANK YOU!
Now need to make a proper decision between Mackie Uni Pro and Akai for Ableton (www.ableton.com/touch) …
Mackie is 2x mose expensive… ufff , its hard.
I don’t know if I can use your patience more… will you recommend any cheap and good / solid active midi keyboard. Wide keys and 4 octaves?…
Don’t know if USB or MIDI connections.. I can handle both..
Thank you and thank you again.
I don’t know if you realize that our conversation is actually ready article for somebody who have some savings and want to start small home studio immediately.
This is our list by now:
1 MacBook
2 Motu Ultralite
3 Audio-Technica headphones
4 Mackie Cntrl Universal Pro / Akai APC 40
5 Yamaha HS80M studio monitors
6…. <- midi keyboard
7…. <- anything else needed to start?
Ciao!
Synonym Music March 19th
I agree with the point about headphones. I’ve developed a sense of mine over the past 3 or 4 years and can get a mix further along on them since I don’t quite have the money for good nearfields. There are definitely things that even great headphones cannot represent accurately:
1) Indefinite or variable pitch, most common with percussive instruments like marimbas, congas, steel drums, etc. The same phenomenon sometimes happens with vocalists and headphone mixes. Basically the waveform does not fully develop when you have speakers so close to your ears, and thus we hear the sound at a different period of the wave. It can become even worse with low end which constitutes long wavelengths.
2) Harmonics – mainly the obvious ones. This happens all the time with synth basses made up of complex waveforms. On the headphones its smooth, on other listening systems its buzzy.
3) Forward depth to some extent, especially with soundtrack or classical recordings.
4) It’s more fatiguing in general.
( )Ian D April 7th
Cheers Mo, a good all round view of it. I liked the point that you need to focus on the sounds from the get go. often I jump in an find hasty sounds to get the idea down and then get stuck wondering why my tracks sound lack lustre.
( )Joe April 27th
What if we are using Reason, how could you use mixers/interfaces
( )UPRISE TV May 13th
gr8 advice -especially about not being disheartened if u find a system in which u don’t like the sound. you can’t win them all, esp. with a home setup. You just boosted some confidence in my mixes, good read!
( )Lee Richardson May 20th
Great article Mo, thanks a lot.
Whilst there’s a lot of discussion on sound cards I’ve recently purchased a Edirol USB AudioCapture UA-25EX sound card (External interface) which set me back £175. (see it here http://www.rolandus.com/products/productdetails.aspx?ObjectId=970 )
Have you ever used one of these before and if so what is your take on it? It’s doing a good job for me so i suppose thats all that matters. I just hope i made the right choice in selecting this card and didn’t miss out on something better for that price?
Thanks in advance Mo.
Lee
( )ITEM REUBEN June 17th
hello Mo,
i’ve read through ur ”how to achieve good translation in ur mixes” and am happy to read a little about this topic. am an electronic music producer got
( )a room studio of my.am from Nigeria and i’ve been longing to further more
in my audio engineering skills and i think this is the right source i can go through. it’s a dream i need to acomplish.hoping to hear from u soonest.
Stan July 8th
I just picked up a nice Mackie MCU Pro. My primary work is VO’s for film, commercials and animations. My secondary objective is for manipulating the various audio, music, SFX and foleying tracks for films. It is a fact that I do not have a single MIDI device. I work in Premier, Audition and sometimes Soundbooth. The audio PCI card is an M-Audio Delta 44 with 4 in/4out 1/4 inch plugs in a BOB.
If I go from Mic to dbx 286A to PC, then USB to Mackie… will this work? Also… how do I get my Digitech Effects Processor into the chain and control its levels?
This set-up would not use a single MIDI in or out on the Mackie. Is this do-able?
( )Daryl January 1st
Hi Mo. You have some of the most helpful and interesting articles that I’ve seen on the Internet. I’ve been able to get some fairly decent mixes to my music with my home studio. I have gone out and tested some of my music on as many systems that I can get access to. It sounded alright.
The main problems that I’m having is too much bass in my music and not enough punch. And the mixing was noticably different from what I heard in the home studio. This has been a big issue for me as I try to mix and master my own music. But, now I know that I still have an awful lot to learn. I didn’t know that using headphones to mix and master with is like “taking a knife to a gun-fight”.
This article has cleared a lot of issues for me. Thank you for posting this content.
( )Terry January 2nd
I think that’s the first time I’ve seen the words “reasonable price point” and “Apogee” used in the same sentence.
( )