Mastering Elements Part 5: Mastering Limiters

Mastering Elements Part 5: Mastering Limiters

Tutorial Details
  • Difficulty: Intermediate/Advanced
  • Time: 1 hour
  • Requirements: Any DAW with a limiter plug-in
This entry is part 5 of 6 in the series Mastering Elements

As we have learnt in the last four sections of this series, there can be many parts to a mastering chain. When I am mastering a track for a client or teaching the subject on a one to one basis, limiting and volume are often the first things I’m asked about.

Many people still seem to want ‘super hot’, ear bleedingly loud masters. Limiting is often how this effect is achieved, so let’s take a look at how these processor produce these levels and what the side effects of excessive volume are.

This is a very in depth subject and I’ve tried to keep things succinct but it is a little longer than usual, so try to stay awake!!


1: Perceived Volume

The first thing to understand about the all important limiting phase of our mastering chain is that even small amounts of the process will increase the perceived level of a track. Simply put this means it may not actually read as louder on your meter but it will sound louder to the human ear.

This effect is created by a reduced dynamic response and relies on the fact we as humans judge volume using average levels. So cutting a very long story, very short… compress and limit your track more, reduce it’s dynamics and ultimately you will create a signal that sounds louder.

Below is the same file peaking at the same level, the first untreated and the second limited. Which is louder? Technically they are the same level but of course the second appears louder due to it’s reduced dynamic range.

The Sonnox limiter used to treat the clips.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

An normalised audio clip peaking at 0db.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

The same clip limited to 0db appears louder

All seems pretty straight forward and innocent right? Wrong. Reducing the dynamics in our music does increase perceived volume but it also introduces distortion, moves us closer to the dynamic signature of noise and at the end of the day, it goes someway to removing the original soul and movement from our music.

Saying this, not all limiting is bad and don’t let me make you think you shouldn’t increase the levels of your masters. There is a halfway house here and you can create loud masters that still contain dynamics and don’t leave you feeling like your ears have lost a fight with a rhino.

The trick here is to understand what you mastering limiter is doing and how it achieving it’s volume. As ever, understand the process and you’ll start to think about how much of it you are applying. Let’s look the different areas of limiting and listen to a few examples.


2: The Brick Wall

Most limiters that are intended to be used in the mix use a compression ratio of over 1:10. Anything above this is considered to be limiting of some form and this will often get the job done when applied to individual instruments.

These limiters may often have a pretty soft output limit and may not be 100% strict in there final levels. Mastering limiters however have to be exact and will often feature higher ratios and a totally strict control on the final level. These task specific processors are often know as ‘brick wall’ limiters.

It maybe that you are already using a brick wall type limiter already. When using plug-ins in your mastering chain it’s always a good to idea to opt for something that is designed for the purpose. Check the manufacturer’s website and the manual for you plug-in to see if it’s specification is up to the task of mastering.

Of course some plug-ins are quite obviously mastering tools and in some cases even there name gives this away. Reason’s MClass processors are obviously intended for mastering and Izotope’s Ozone is also an excellent suite of tools to get you started. For something a little pricier you might want to try Flux plug-ins, Universal Audio’s precision mastering range and IK Multimedia’s excellent T-Racks collection.

Izotope Ozone contains an excellent brick wall limiter.

The UAD precision limiter is a slightly more upmarket option.

All these examples contain some form of brick wall limiter but there are literally countless other plug-ins to choose from on the market. You may even have one lurking in your DAWs bundled plug-in list. It’s worth mentioning that sometimes a mastering limiter maybe called a maximiser. This is often a cut down, easy to use mastering limiter for simply increasing the inherent volume of your audio.

The Cubase maximiser.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

An audio clip with no limiting.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

And with some Steinberg Maximiser applied.


3: Setting Your Levels

Most mastering limiters achieve their effect by the in/out level being driven into the unit against a literal brick wall on the output section. The output can be fine tuned to a level it never goes over. Gain reduction then occurs when the signal is pushed against this virtual output barrier. In reality the input of these processors can be driven to a point where the gain reduction is so high that absolutely no dynamics are present, so it’s worth taking care here.

The first thing to do when you start to use these limiters is to set your output level. By default they will generally be set to 0dB. In most cases this is fine, although some mastering engineers do prefer to go very slightly below this, so maybe -0.01dB. This ensures that absolutely no playback devices are clipped by the material.

With your output set you can start to drive the limiter using the input. As you do this your overall level will increase massively and once you hit 0dB and move beyond this point, you will get gain reduction, limiting and even more volume. This is where you need to go easy.

Generally speaking, 3-4dB of reduction in most situations is plenty. More than this and some material will start to suffer from lack of dynamic range and will become fatiguing to listen to and generally noisy. It’s also questionable how much more volume you will juice after this point.

A good test here is to check if you have any dynamic movement. Keep a close eye on your metering and ensure that there is dynamic movement in your material. I you are in doubt get hold of a meter that includes dynamic range information, this will give you your actual perceived loudness in real time.

Setting the levels on Logic’s adaptive mastering limiter


4: Attack and Release

Other controls you are likely to find on a typical mastering limiter are attack and release. Some will only feature release and some will feature neither, it really depends on the manufacturer or designer. When you come across these parameters it’s best to use longer times than you would during mixing.

I cant remember exactly where I heard it but someone once said (in connection with mastering dynamics) “…give me a compressor and limiter with attack and release times of forever and I’ll be happy”. This stuck with me and I started experimenting with long times and they really do work.

Longer times here generally result in more transparent, organic compression and limiting at the mastering stage and work well for me in most cases. Obviously every body is different and so are their projects, so you may want to try different settings and see what works for you.

Some nice long attack and release times on the T-Racks brick wall limiter


5: Soft saturation and extra settings.

Some mastering limiters will offer extra features, usually at the end of their signal path, and these can include soft saturation and soft clip algorithms. This really means as you approach zero db and start induce gain reduction, or ‘clipping’, a tape like soft limiting will occur. This often adds extra harmonics and a warmth associated with analog tape machines.

Not all limiters have these features and they are seen by some as gimmicks but it’s worth knowing what they are when you see them. As rule approach any enhancement process in your mastering chain with caution and do plenty of A/B’ing to check if what your adding is an improvement.

The soft clip function on Reason 5′s MClass maximizer’

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Some audio treated by Reason’s maximizer.

Series Navigation«Mastering Elements Part 4: Stereo EnhancementMastering Elements Part 6: Export and Dithering»

Add Comment

Discussion 12 Comments

  1. ExtremRaym says:

    Excellent !

    is there a part 6 of mastering elements ?
    I can’t wait for it, if there is !

    Great job !

  2. Fabio says:

    Actually, I think it’s better to set the limit to -0.1 dB to avoid cliping on some consumer’s DAC (cheap CD players or soundcards)
    You can download an excellent free VST meter made by SSL, that indicates the real analog cliping of a signal, simulating interleaves :

    http://www.solid-state-logic.com/music/x-ism/index.asp

    And for MP3 compression, it’s better to have a master limited to -0.3 dB or -0.4 dB, this allows a compression algorythm like LAME to give a better definition to the mp3-compressed track.

    • ExtremRaym says:

      I agree, it’s exactly what is written in the Mastering Engineer Hanbook :)

      • Mo Volans says:
        Author

        I agree that this is the traditional train of thought and it’s exactly what I was taught 15 years ago but to be honest I think it’s a little outdated now. Of course it’s personal preference. I often master under 0db but 99% of the commercial tracks I see come in are mastered right on the bleeding edge of 0db a hair under clipping.

        Again… what you are saying and what it says int he mastering handbook is 100% accurate just maybe a little outdated. I’m not sure how many people are still using devices that clip at 0db.

    • Brandon says:

      I agree. Everyone I’ve learned from has said -0.1 is really pushing it and -0.2 is still a bit high. I use -.3 because no one hears .3 dB sound difference. And it sure is a lot better than risking clipping.

      I’m not an expert on digital to analog but I also heard somewhere that -.1 was acceptable because of the natural compression/warm clipping analog systems gave? At least with digital music -.2 or 3 is the way to go.

  3. Clericuzio says:

    just to add for the list, I find the Stillwells “Event Horizon” to be a rather good limiter/clipper (you can choose) http://www.stillwellaudio.com/?page_id=16

  4. Matt Hughes says:

    Great Tut Mo- thanks. Is there anyway that the flash images can be presented in a format that us Mac users can view?

    Thanks again, Matt

    • Adrian Try says:
      Staff

      Hi Matt. I agree – it’s a great tut! Which Flash images do you mean? There is an ad in the middle of the tut that currently only people in the US can see. And there are audio examples (played by a Flash player) throughout the tut. These should work OK on a Mac, but currently don’t work on iOS devices. Adrian

  5. loopz says:

    Another good one, Mo!
    Thanks.

  6. For you Logic guys who want to dive in a lot deeper I’ve a great Logic Mastering tutorial at macProVideo called “Logic’s Mastering Toolbox” you can find it here:

    http://www.macprovideo.com/tutorial/Logic401

    3 hours of Logic mastering comprising 40 videos!

    Check it out!

    Steve H

  7. Steve says:

    Great stuff! We use Voxengo’s The Elephant limiter for alot of our work. When analog is not an option software works well. The issue with cheaper plugins like Stillwell and IK Media is the the harshness that builds up. This subtle smearing is often un-noticeable on mid price and lower priced monitors. If you use the cheap plugin from bargin companies or from less DAW’s like Reaper or Audacity, you’ll always be asking yourself why can’t I get that pro sound. It’s the build up of extremely small defects in the cheaper digital products combined by the inability to detect and correct/avoid such defects.

Add a Comment