The 15 Minute Mix

The 15 Minute Mix

Tutorial Details
  • Difficulty: Beginner/Intermediate
  • Time: 15 minutes (firm)
  • Requirements: DAW and a song to mix

Consider this your challenge for today. Take a song that you just recorded, or have been working on and mix it in 15 minutes. Shut off everything, pull the faders up and follow the following tutorial. Use a stopwatch to keep track of time and when you should be switching tasks.

If you don’t have any sessions to try, you can use any of these 50 different multi-tracks.

Ready? Set. Go!


Minutes 0–2: Balance & Pans

One of the best places to start a mix, especially when you’re in a rush, is the chorus. Alternatively, find the busiest part of the song and start there. The place where most of the instruments are playing at once is the most effective place to mix. You’ll hear all the instruments clashing with each other.

But it’s a much better place to start mixing instead of the quiet verse where there are maybe only two instruments playing. Because, if you get those two instruments sounding great and then the song explodes, you’re basically back to square one.

Once you’ve found the busiest part of the song, it’s time to find a good balance. Throw out the common mixing tip of starting with the foundation. Start with all faders up and quickly move them around until you get a relatively good balance. Remember, you only have two minutes so you have to act quick.

While you move the faders, use the chance to pan the tracks around. Stick to the general guidelines:

  • Kick, snare, bass and vocal in the center.
  • Spread the toms from right to left.
  • If you have two rhythm instruments, pan them to each side so that they each have space to breathe. You can do hard left and right if you wish, or you can be more conservative.
  • Spread the backing vocals around the center.
  • Keep stereo pads in the center.
  • Pan lead instruments off center.

You should be able to get a pretty good mix going immediately. Especially if you’re working with well recorded tracks.


Minutes 2–4: Subtractive EQ

Now that you’ve got a good balance, break out your EQ. Don’t worry about the make and model, just whatever you’re comfortable with and use often.

Only use this EQ to cut unnecessary frequencies from every instrument.

Start with filters

  • Filter the bass and kick drum to around 32 Hz. Almost seems unnecessary but it sometimes makes a difference.
  • Almost everything else, unless it’s a very bass heavy instrument can be filtered up to 100 Hz.
  • Get rid of the high-end. Kick drums don’t need a lot of high frequencies, and the bass usually doesn’t either.
  • Use low-pass filters on doubled vocals and backing vocals to make them blend in.

Subtractive EQ Guidelines

  • Cut drums at 400 Hz to get rid of boxiness.
  • If the guitars are interfering with the vocal, try a shallow but wide cut at around 3 kHz.
  • If the bass is too boomy, cut in the area from 140–250 Hz.
  • If the vocals sound too nasally, cut around 1 kHz.

For other problematic areas, scanning around the frequency spectrum with a narrow boost will often reveal annoying characteristics that need cutting, such as snare drum ringing or hissy guitars.


Minutes 6–8: Compression

For the purpose of this exercise, presets are allowed. As I’ve said before, A Preset is a Starting Point! However, make sure that the ratio and threshold are actually doing something. Because if the signal isn’t hitting the threshold, nothing is being compressed.

It’s fine to use a “Rhythm Guitar” compression preset, or “In Your Face Vocals!” as long as you tweak the threshold and ratio to your liking. While you’re at it, make sure that you compensate the amount of dB compressed with additional make-up gain. Meaning that if you’re compressing 4 dB on average, boost the makeup gain to about 4 dB to compensate.


Minutes 8–10: EQ Enhancement

Around this time your mix should be sounding pretty good even with minimal adjustments. It’s crazy how far balance, EQ and compression can go. Now you can add some sparse EQ enhancement to your tracks.

For instance,

  • Boost the low-mids of a guitar track to bring out some punchiness.
  • Bring out the presence of a vocal around 5 kHz.
  • Add shimmer to cymbals with a high-shelving EQ from 12 kHz.
  • Boost the body of the snare at 500 Hz, or alternatively bring out the attack at 3 kHz.

Don’t try to boost the same frequency in many instruments. Make each instrument have their own respective boost, in their own area. Otherwise they might clash and you’ll cause more problems.


Minutes 10–12 – Delay and Reverb

Look at the reverbs and delays from a live sound perspective. Live engineers sometimes have very limited resources but they can make just a few processors go far.

  • Insert three auxiliary sends, one for drums, one for instruments and one for vocals.
  • Get a warm chamber or a diffused hall reverb of some sort for the drums. You don’t want it to be too reflective since it will easily muddy up the mix. A gated drum reverb was very popular when I was doing live sound so search for something of the sort.
  • Send all your instruments to a medium sized room. Now here’s the trick. Have the reverb fader all the way up (to zero dB) and then send each instrument to the reverb. Depending on how far back you want to push the instrument depends on how much of the instrument you send to the reverb. The more reverb you apply to each instrument, the more space you will hear around them. This is a very quick and dirty way to create depth and separation between instruments.
  • Don’t drown the vocal in reverb so use a separate aux track for it. I would recommend a medium delay that thickens up the vocal, adds space to it while still keeping it in the forefront of the song. If you want, you can add reverb after the delay, essentially making your delay work as a pre-delay for the reverb.

These three effects track should be enough for a lot of band-driven songs. Sometimes less is more effective.


Minutes 12-15: Automation & Reassessment

Use the last three minutes of your time to rebalance your tracks. After the EQ, compression and effects, your original balance might be a little off.

You should be able to get back to the original balance by moving the faders around. Now you’ve got a balanced, EQed, compressed mix with depth so the only thing left to do is to add little automations here and there to make the mix breathe.


Conclusion

How did you do? Was it possible? Considering a live engineer should be able to get a workable sound from the band’s first song of the night, I hope you could at least get close in 15 minutes.

What was your biggest struggle?

  • val

    instrumental sounds tight and well fitted but vocals seem to be out of place.. how to process vocals like professionals without the expensive equipment

  • slapaix

    Thanks a lot for the tutorial
    I’m new to this and just want to make sure I understand correctly. A couple of questions…

    “Filter the bass and kick drum to around 32 Hz”
    Is this just low-pass filtering everything above 32 Hz?

    “Cut drums at 400 Hz’ mean have a dip down around 400Hz”
    Does this mean putting a dip in the eq at 400Hz?

    Thanks again

    • Jeremiah

      The filter at 32 Hz should be a highpass filter. You want to get rid of useless low frequencies. To cut at 400 Hz, you would use a peaking band in an eq and dip the level a bit.

      • http://www.audio-issues.com Björgvin
        Author

        Thanks Jeremiah, that’s exactly what I meant. I could have been a little clearer but you saved me!

  • http://isharearena.com M.Aswad Mehatb

    Nice one !

  • http://www.villaruse.com Likko

    Whew! Man, just reading over this, and thinking of the time frames gave me a pretty heft sized anxiety attack. haha. I’ve been reading this site for about 2 years now, this is my first comment…

    Looking forward to giving it a try.

    • http://www.audio-issues.com Björgvin
      Author

      Haha, don’t be anxious! Look at it as a challenge. Great to see you commenting though. I’m glad you saw a reason to :)

  • John

    Great tutorial. This is a really great skill to have to just get the song off the ground after laying the tracks. Especially after a long session and the clients want to hear what they did all day. Have em go out for a smoke and so forth and slam out a quick mix.

  • LargerLife

    Great challenge, and useful for getting better in mixing decision making. But I don’t think so it is possible to complete within the time frame, If you have 40+ tracks, and are not familiar with them at all. Maybe 1 hour could work at those situations.

  • http://lolwut.com Andyisgay

    What do you do between the 4th and 6th minute?!

    • http://adriantry.com Adrian Try

      lol. A toilet break maybe. So it’s only a 13 minute mix. No wonder people were feeling rushed!

      • http://www.audio-issues.com Björgvin
        Author

        Whoop! I guess I can’t count :) I guess the point of the exercise is the same, but now you have a little more time :)

  • http://www.patjacobsmusic.com Pat Jacobs

    Love it! Very creative way of looking at mixing. Trying it tonight just to have a little fun.

  • http://www.tricky-loops.de Tricky Loops

    Why the hell 15 minutes? Why everything in this fast-paced (western) world has to be done in less time – faster, harder, stronger, better…or better worse? Some mix needs 10 minutes and some mix may need several months.

    It is important to LISTEN to your own mix. Such things as “Lower the eq at XXX hz” are not really useful as every drum track is different. Every kick is different as it is every snare.

    The most important thing is to listen carefully to your own track and experiment with the eq settings. Not by eye (“I must lower it at exactly 400 hertz”), but by ear.

    That’s important: to put in MORE time to experiment and to expand your experience – not making 15 minute or in-ten-steps-you-get-it-all-mixes.

    The MORE time you invest, the BETTER is the mix. Or do we seriously want a world with “So you can live your whole life in 15 minutes”?

    • GeauxSe

      I have seen many ads for mixing engineers wanted in my Nashville area. One of the main requirements was the ability to “fully mix and master to achieve a professional sounding, radio-ready song in 4-6 hours”. Granted, that’s not 15 minutes, but it’s still a hell of a short period of time to spend on a quality mix. I think the general idea of the tutorial is to not get bogged down. So many beginners get held up in a certain area over thinking, over analyzing. This is a great way to go with your gut. Pump that mix out and see how you did!

      • http://www.tricky-loops.de Tricky Loops

        But what’s the advantage of mixing and mastering in 4 – 6 hours – especially for the client?

        Making an order at the studio, then go to work and get the full mastered mix in the evening??

        As a client I would wait even a week if I’d get a specially mastered mix that stands out from the other mixes. But if I have to pay the same price for 4 – 6 hours that I’ve former paid for a week, then the only impulsion for this seems to be that the studio owner wants to get more money in less time. BTW it’s a difference if the song consists of 4 tracks (maybe some of the Beatles) or of 100 tracks.

        For me as a musician and listener the quality of a song is much more important than if the mix will be done in 4 hours or 4 days.

        Not only in music, but also in other categories. If I would go (for the same price) in a restaurant and get a delicious, (at least partly) fresh prepared meal in half an hour, I’d be happier than if I would go there, get the meal in 5 minutes and it tastes like convenience food.

        Earth doesn’t spin ten times faster than ten years before but why people do??

    • http://www.audio-issues.com Björgvin
      Author

      I think you missed the point entirely.

      • http://www.tricky-loops.de Tricky Loops

        So what’s the point? To make music like car racing?

        It’s all about time arrangement. No client needs a song in 15 minutes. Maybe he wants but he doesn’t need. Perhaps sometimes it’s possible to mix and master a song in 5 minutes. But this will not be quality any more. Then every song is equally mixed and mastered as the other like look-all-the-same-rolls from the supermarket.

    • http://www.simonherring.com Simon

      Just a bit of a fun challenge…

      Although things like this will be good for focus. After a while your ears will get use to quickly focusing on key areas to create a good foundation. From there you can then really polish the track.

      Besides, as the conclusion hints at. If you want to get into live engineering your going to need to identify solutions pretty quickly and challenges like this must surely be good for that.

      • http://www.tricky-loops.de Tricky Loops

        I haven’t heard of LIVE ENGINEERS that mix and master a whole song in 15 minutes directly on stage. For a live engineer the song has to be already mixed (sometimes even mastered or taken in stems) and the job of the live engineer is the observation of the sound quality, timbre and volume. Maybe a DJ has to mix live, but that has nothing to do with 15 minutes. A live engineer can change some elements, but he doesn’t mix and master a whole song in 15 minutes. That’s the job of the mixing engineer and of the mastering engineer.

        I have nothing against challenges. I’ve only criticized this “faster-more-faster-most-fastest-approach”. There are more skills required in music business than being fast.

        If people wouldn’t be permanently so fast and would invest MORE time, devotion and dedication in their songs, then there were much more good songs.

        This was whereon my critic hints at.

  • http://www.santoclemenzi.com Santo

    Excellent post Björgvin! You’re advices are ALWAYS welcome, I read everything you write and I think you really help your readers to improve their mix, thank you!

  • Chris Burke

    Dear Bjorn

    I am thinking of buying your Ebooks “Record great music with anything you’ve got” and “mixing strategies”,but I have a question.

    I am disabled and do everything on a notation package, Quick Score Elite Level 2 , and a mouse. I can’t play a keyboard.Do the tips/strategies in your book apply to someone who’s wholly MIDI-based, or only to live instruments?

    The second question is – I am very confused on how much you need to spend on initial sounds. I read on some sites that bad sounds can be fixed ‘in the mix’, other sites say ‘NOO-Only the BEST East-wWest Orchestra Will Do, others telling you not to use presets, must create your own sounds from scratch… I’m a wannabe NewAge composer -relaxing drones, pads’n’ panpipes, who’s drowning in a quagmire of technical non-understanding. Aren’t I allowed to just use a bunch of presets and make music with them? And if I do,would your mixing strategies book hold true for a piece using no real/live instruments?

    Yours very confusedly,

    Chris

    • http://www.audio-issues.com Björgvin
      Author

      I would think both books apply to any music, regardless of if they’re instrument or midi based. The recording book definitely devotes more time to recording instruments but there are good tips in there for anything. And Mixing Strategies can be used for any mix, regardless of arrangement. I come from a live sound/band based background but I’d hope that the strategies work for any type of music.

      Both books have guarantees, so if you feel that they didn’t help, you can get your money back.

  • Grant Tregellas

    I think this post highlights an important issue: productivity. While the “15min” timeframe may seem a bit extreme, the point that I think is being made is that in every project, you need to decide how long your are prepared to work on each element.

    If you decide ahead of time that each song NEEDS a whole week to be mixed, well then thats exactly how long its going to take. So 3 months to mix the album? If that’s how long it takes to mix then I assume the entire album will take about a year to do. If someone has the luxury and money to work like that, great. Most bands don’t, and most producer I would assume want to create content at a faster pace than that.

    As an example: One guitar session I played on was for a country/pop band. Now, obviously the band was paying by the day for the studio. I had to come in, do 2-3 takes per part (acoustic/electric/solos/fills etc) and that was it. I could have left, but I hung around on some days to watch how the rest of the track got done.

    It was the same way, the producer would lay down keys part very quickly, the vocalist (who is also an amazing drummer) would go in a put down quick percussion bit, do the backing vocals parts in one take and then double them again. Within a few hours most of the tracking got done. And it actually sounded pretty good. Could it have been done better? Sure, but there really was no time. Everyone had to just focus and bring their “A game” and do a pro job.

    Now, I wasn’t around for the mixing stage, but I imagine it worked pretty much the same way, because that album was done and released very quickly. And it ended up sounding really good.

    So, my point is: If I give myself 4 hours to mix a track, will it be twice as good if I decide to spend 8 hours on the same track? If I take a whole week will it be 10x better? Don’t think so.

    My experience working as a musician in studios has taught me that the real pros go about it in a very tight, focused timeframe. They have projects to get done, they decide how long to spend on each part and then just get it done. And when the time is up, that’s it. They finish the job and ship. Then on to the next project.

    Yes, we all know of artists that take 5 years to do an album. I also heard that the first Van Halen album was tracked in 1 week! And that became a rock classic….

    • http://www.tricky-loops.de Tricky Loops

      As a rock band of course you can record the song in one session and if you have a mixing template, you can mix it in 15 minutes. On the other hand you can spend years to find the optimal guitar sound (think of Carlos Santana), make amplifier, distortion and eq research and spend 5 years to mix it (if you want to sound so special than no one others).

      But if you were a producer of electronic dance music, you’d have more than a few takes of guitars, drums and vocals. You can’t mix 40 tracks in 15 minutes. Even Calvin Harris couldn’t do it. More, he dished up the story of the stolen laptop in order to have more time to produce his new song (as he confessed himself).

      I must admit I tend to confound the mixing process with the arranging. If everything is totally done arranged, then the mixing process alone takes not so much time.

      And regarding productivity: You can release 4 albums in a year and only a few one buy it — or you can release a album every few years and everyone buys it. The first one is the best way to burn out. The last one is much more intelligent if you want to have a income as a musician.

      • Leandro

        Hey, Tricky Loops, you missed the point, as Björgvin and other people said before.

        The thing is not about doing it fast, but doing it.
        Although it is pretty reasonable to do so in 15 minutes, having the song already edited and prepared, and then just taking a few more hours to refine the mix, I really doubt anyone here has taken the “15-minute” literally.
        For me, the first decisions made when mixing end up being the better ones, and I’ve already seen many people saying the same.

        You’re not being critical (at least not constructively), not being helpful… can you see that?

        So why don’t you just quit the shallow critics and invest some more precious time building a better website for you, then? Or are you taking 4 years to develop the best website ever?

        (Yes, I’ve clicked your website and listened to your “latest song”).

        Björgvin, thanks a lot for this and all other tuts you post!

      • http://www.tricky-loops.de Tricky Loops

        It is abashing that some of the musicians here (for example Leandro) have to disable the reply-button because they have so much fear to get an answer to their imputation…

        They don’t have a own website and criticize the websites of others…

        Sorry, that’s only ridiculous… But for those people I have no time. When they have no arguments, they’re bashing against others.

        What I wanna make, is make people think about some things in our (music) society. If they don’t think about it, they’re not mature enough.

        And Björgvin has not given me at least one intelligent answer except “You have missed the point”. Sorry, that’s very poor. If you don’t take people’s critic for serious, I can’t take you for serious, too.

  • Norbert

    Good article. When you look at it literally, its about doing a quick mix, but whats more important hidden there- it is a nice review of basics of mixing, whats most important. Really sometimes we may focus and spend hours on some minor things, while neglecting or overlooking the very core processes, and this article is a good shortlist of those (probably not full and complete, but a good start).

  • woocatt

    hi Bjorn…. i have only stumbled on this site by accident a few weeks ago , and within this time my understanding of mixing eq etc has improved tremendously….i have a 16 track zoom multistudio , a pair of JBL Control 1′s and a bass guitar .i record my band now with more confidence to make decisions necessary to make cleaner recordings and go home and have fun..i thoroughly enjoy reading any post you make and always look forward to the next…i cannot afford to go on a course as they can run into hundreds even thousands of pounds and appreciate people like yourself that give valuable info for people like me who can only learn from books , mags and learning by making costly mistakes. weather or not i can make a good mix in 15 mins ? i will find out tomorrow…the point is there will always be people that will criticize , but i will take your challenge for what it is… to help make decisions and to work a bit more efficiently… . i look forward to your next post….eagerly…….woocatt

  • http://www.cowstongue.wordpress.com Christian

    That was a lot of fun and very educational for me.
    My main challenge was the second last part with the aux reverbs which I don’t know yet how to do in logic so will make it my next thing to learn.
    But I found all of the parts challenging and way longer than the fifteen minutes. It was a great time.
    Thank-you!

    • http://www.audio-issues.com Björgvin
      Author

      Hey Christian it’s easy. If you’re in the mixer window just click on one of the sends and select a bus, in this case bus 1. Logic will automatically create an aux bus in the mixer window that you can send to. Do the same for the drum tracks, and then bus 2 for instruments and bus 3 for vocals(in the context of this tutorial)

      -

      To all the others, thanks for the great comments. What a great community we have!

      Ps. It’s Bjorgvin, not Bjorn. I understand that people might think that my name shortens, but it does not :) That is all! :) Thanks for reading.

      • http://www.tricky-loops.de Tricky Loops

        Yes, it’s a great community. You’re the king. You know everything better than others.

        You don’t have to accept critics. You’re the best musician in the world. Everyone loves you.

        You write the best books in the world. You make the best music. You have the best studio. You teach the best stuff. You are the best man of the world. Not that maybe you are a bit chesty, no??

  • LargerLife

    Hey @TrickyLoops, in a first glipms, I thought you have right with the fast pace of nowadays, but also you missed the whole point of 15min challenge, mentioned above (below) Now I see, you are out of reasoning so you begin to attack on personal level. Nice.. but rather annoying.
    Björgvin keep up the good work!

    • http://www.tricky-loops.de Tricky Loops

      I’m not attacking anyone. But I expect from an author an intelligent, well thought out answer and not only a rough “You’ve missed the point entirely.”

      I thought that Björgvin were an intelligent young men who is able to take critic and think about it. But the only thing he has done was to praise the community for standing beside him – as I were a threat for him. IMO that was very arrogant. I don’t like people who think they have the only right point of view.

      Instead of making war out of a critic, you all should seriously think about my tipps (to work MORE time on your songs and make them outstanding instead of making 15-minutes-instant-mixes.)

  • http://www.simonherring.com Simon

    Maybe we should think about ending this. We seem to be heading down a nasty path.

    Tricky Loops, I think your right in saying people should take more time and care over their mixes. Its better to have one great sounding album than a dozen botched ones. It’s a point that is clearly very important to you. Maybe you could write an article demonstrating it’s importance.

    But this article has never denied that. Its just a fun challenge, aimed at the beginner/intermediate to help with focus, the way deadlines do.

    Some think this is a good idea, some don’t. If we all agreed all the time, it would be a boring world. But things start to get pointless once we start laying into each other (whether it be them personally or their website for example). It would be a shame if this community started to get like that.

    • http://www.tricky-loops.de Tricky Loops

      All what I wanted was a discussion with an other point of view (invest more time for mixing, make your music outstanding) and at least one meaningful, intelligent answer from Björgvin (or some more).

      Because that’s what people really helps – to make them think about. If I’d write below every article “Thanks. It’s so good. I wanna read more. Your articles are the best.” — what could people benefit from?

      I don’t wanna waste my time writing below every article laudatory comments. If I rather can get people to scrutinize things from another point of view, then I have hit the target.

  • http://www.audio-issues.com Björgvin
    Author

    Hello Tricky Loops. Thanks for all of your comments. They have actually been pretty informative, and you do raise an interesting point. (Please read this comment to the end.)

    However, this tutorial was intended as a challenge of what you could do in 15 minutes. It was not intended as a stance against those who take more time than 15 minutes to mix a song. I do not mix songs in 15 minutes and consider them mixed. I was trying to teach workflow and seeing the bigger picture in a short amount of time. You are allowed to continue mixing after the 15 minute mark.

    You say “there are more skills required in music business than being fast.” I agree. But this tutorial isn’t about all the skills needed in the music business. No tutorial is that exhaustive. I have written around 90 or so tutorials for this site. That’s over 90,000 words of material and countless hours spent trying to provide value to the readers of this community. Many of my tutorials might not have hit the mark, or don’t cater to everyone. And that’s fine. You’re entitled to think that this tutorial is useless to you. I happen to think it provides value on workflow and productivity in the mixing stage. That’s why I wrote it. Coming up with fresh ideas for tutorials gets harder as you write more, and I thought this tutorial served as an interesting challenge as well as quick overview over the mixing phase. I like quick and simple tips, and this tutorials showcases that.

    You ask, “what’s the advantage of mixing and mastering in 4 -6 hours?” Time and money is the advantage, especially if you know that you’re getting a good mix because you hired a good mixing engineer. I mix and charge per song, not per hour. That doesn’t mean I try to take the least amount of time mixing. I mix until I believe I’ve done the best job I can do. I also don’t think bands would like to pay for 4 days of work for one song when it could be mixed in 4 hours. No one will pay for 32 hours of work when they can get the same results in 4 hours, and I think it’s very unethical for someone to charge for that. I agree with you that “the quality of a song is much more important” but time is not the best indicator and measurement of a song’s quality.

    You say “The MORE time you invest, the BETTER is the mix.” I don’t agree with that at all. There is a point of diminished marginal return that happens after you’ve mixed a song for a certain period of time. That means that every minute mixed after that point doesn’t contribute anything of value to the song. Billy Jean by Michael Jackson was mixed 91 times but they ended up going with mix number 2. It sounded the best, it wasn’t the mix they spent the most amount of time on.

    When I say that I love this great community, I mean it. I’ve gotten some criticism in the past and I’ve taken steps to make sure that my tutorials are up to the standards of the readers here. You are a part of that community, and I wasn’t excluding you from it. However, I would refrain from personal attacks such as “You’re the king. You know everything better than others. You have the best studio. You teach the best stuff.” It’s not really constructive and not only denigrates me, but the other writers on this page. I certainly don’t have the best studio and I’m certainly no king. I just happen to love audio and have a knack about writing about.

    So far, people(usually) like the tips and tricks I offer and as long as the majority is interested in what I have to say, I’ll keep saying it. I didn’t answer you outright because I thought the community was actually doing a good job of telling you why you’d “missed the point.” But when I realized you wanted a personal discussion I was happy to answer you.

    I hope that answers any and all of your questions. Please note that I will not be answering any follow up comments. This response took me long enough to write and I don’t see the return in continuing the discussion.

    Vielen dank,
    Björgvin

  • http://www.tricky-loops.de Tricky Loops

    Okay, that’s finally a detailed and balanced reply. Thank you.

    Therefore I apologize me for the “personal attack” in the named post. I have personally nothing against you, I’m happy about everyone who shares his experience in audio production with the people.

    If you’d have given me THAT balanced answer instead of this rough “You have missed the point entirely.”, then I wouldn’t have been that angry.

    Last points: Even when there’s a time frame or deadline (which have to be, at least for the client), you can improve the songs a lifetime, because you are learning something new every day. Even if you would have 50 years of audio experience, then you would learn by every project still how to make a better sound.

    There is no guarantee that the song is the better the longer you mix it, that’s right. For example you can make the right eq adjustment in a few minutes and get a good sound or you can stumble weeks around it and make a speaker blowing phase cancellation party.

    What I wanted to do is encouraging people to question time frames and invest more dedication and care in their songs. That does neither mean your article is bad nor the purpose of the challenge. I only want to make people think about. That is it (do you have mentioned Michael Jackson? :-)

  • Ruben

    For a 3-track mix, this schedule might actually have a chance ;)

  • http://www.buymytunes.com Nuklea Mojo

    Amazing advice and great way to change the mindset that mixes take ages. Of course the reviewing and tweaking will require more time but getting the basic sound quickly is what it’s all about.

  • Xobacta

    My quíckest mix was done in 30 mins. its also reputed to be one of my best. for me, löng mixes are tiring and boring. if you really understand the genre youre míxíng then you know what people expect to hear and what to focus on. if you have over 40tracks or 80tracks, whö says u have tö use them all??? its like i read ín bobby owinskis boök, most producers add parts than are really ñecessary to a song, its up to yöu to pull the scissors. i say if a song is not seriously shaping üp in 15mins, then you either dont understand the genre or it might not shape up in 15years, so its back to the drawing board or the recording phase. thanks guys

  • Philoso

    As a beginner to mixing i found this tutorial very informative, It gave me a way easier and better understanding of the starting points of getting a good mix. Coming from a home studio producer who is always searching around for a good tutorial to help me out and getting a better sound with my music. I thought this tutorial was great! Thanks alot

  • ONE

    trick loop by the way u were going in on Bjor I thought you must have a amazing sound, well I listened and well its o.k maybe u should spend less time on Bjor and more time on your music. NOW YOU GAVE US A TIP OR TWO WONT YOU???0

  • ignacio

    Hi, i really liked your article, so I was wondering if i could re-publish this on my site, in spanish!

    • http://adriantry.com Adrian Try

      Hi Ignacio. Thanks for the compliment, but I’m sorry we don’t allow our articles to be republished.

  • adam laing

    Thank you, very interesting article for me as it seems my biggest struggle is never being able to stop tweaking. I can never tell myself, “Ok this mix is done”.

    • kev on music

      So true

  • Jawnson

    My struggle is that i already started to put EQ’s on my tracks before creating a proper balance.