Try Tuts+ Premium, Get Cash Back!
How to Take Charge of Your Unruly Reverb

How to Take Charge of Your Unruly Reverb

Tutorial Details
  • Difficulty: Beginner/Intermediate
  • Time: 20 minutes
  • Requirements: Reverb, Gates, EQ, compression

Reverb’s a fun thing to fool around with. It’s a really important processor while mixing, but it can easily clutter your stuff up. Reverb can get in the way of your emphatic vocal performance, your rocking guitar riff or your juicy bass sound.

Some people don’t like using it at all and prefer delay. Preferences aside, it’s important to know what you can do with it.

Sometimes it can add a little too much space to your mix. Every once in a while reverb can get in the way of your tracks, and when that happens, it’s good to know a few different techniques for fixing that mess of space it can create.

In the following tutorial we’ll be looking at a few ways to take charge of your reverb. Using less reverb is always an option, but sometimes you can use other tricks to make your reverb blend in a little better.

I’m going to assume that you know the basics of reverb, but if you don’t, check out my tutorial How the Hell do I Use Reverb Anyway?!? for a quick primer.

Image by: phill.d


Gates

The infamous gated reverb from the 80s is a familiar sound. Take a listen to Prince’s “Purple Rain” and you’ll hear a great example on the snare. It’s basically a way to get a big reverb sound without cluttering up your mix with the long decay and tail those big reverb sounds usually have.

Using gated reverbs don’t necessarily have to have the 80s stigma attached to them. You can get away with using gated reverbs without making your tracks sound like Duran Duran.

In case you don’t know how to make a gated reverb, here are the steps:

  1. Send your desired track to an aux channel and insert a reverb.
  2. Insert a gate after the reverb.
  3. Use the side-chain of the gate and make it listen to the original track you sent there(i.e. Snare).
  4. By tweaking the threshold, attack and release you can get a reverbed sound that lasts as long as you want.

The gate works like a tail cut-off. By side-chaining it to your track, it only plays when the snare hit plays, and for as long as you want, dictated by your settings with the gate.

For some additional reading on gates, check out Mo Volans’s How to Use Gate Plug-ins Effectively.


Compressors

You can use a compressor instead of the gate if you want the effect reversed. For instance, if you have a really big reverb that you want to swell up every time the vocals stop, then insert a compressor after the reverb instead of the gate.

Using your compressor’s side-chain input, link it to your vocal track and tweak the compressor so that it suppresses the reverb every time the vocal starts. Now the singer will stay in the forefront with little reverb while he or she is singing, but once the vocal stops, the compressor stops working and the reverb swells up, giving the vocal a nice long tail.

Try it with slower songs that have rhythmic vocals. You’ll suppress the reverb so that it doesn’t clutter the phrasings of the singer, but the reverb will fill in the gap between phrases when the compressor stops working.

For an even crazier effect, try adding some modulation or delay before the compressor. Or have multiple sends with multiple effects that are all side-chain compressed.


EQng Reverbs

If you want one trick to take home that will make your reverbs sound infinitely better immediately, then keep reading. EQing your reverbs is one of the best ways to control them. It really shouldn’t come as a surprise because EQ is one of the best tools you have in your plug-in arsenal, but I’m amazed at how many people don’t even try EQing their reverb sends.

Filtering out the low frequencies of a reverb can instantly declutter the low end and take away all the muddiness and boominess that you’ve been experiencing. Sometimes the actual instruments don’t sound really muddy, but combined with a large reverb, the low-end quickly builds up. By just filtering out the low-end you can instantly get cleaner mixes.

Similarly, vocals can sound too sibilant or guitars too harsh if there’s too much high-end reverb. If your vocals or guitar sound too bright, maybe it’s just a matter of lightly EQing out the high-end.


The Diffusion Button

If you have a reverb that’s bright and bouncy, the diffusion parameter can sometimes help even it out. Diffusion creates more “liveness.” If a reverb sounds “slappy” and you feel like the reverb is bouncing around too fast, diffusion defuses the slap-backs. So now, instead of a small room reverb that would otherwise create a very short slap-back reverb, you’ll have a more controlled live-sounding reverb. It will sound just as short, but it will be less aggressive.


Pre-Delay to Declutter

Adding pre-delay to a reverb often helps distance the original track from the reverb. It creates a separation between the two that’s very desirable sometimes. You don’t want the reverb to drown our your vocal part, so a bit of pre-delay will distance the reverb from the vocal. If you can imagine yourself in a room with four walls, pre-delay takes those walls and moves them further out so that the reflections return later.

It’s great for vocals, and also for a variety of instrument that need spacious reverb but also need space from the reverb.


Conclusion

Using reverb effectively means a hell of a lot more than just inserting it on an aux bus and finding a nice sounding preset. Sure, that can sound good sometimes, but you usually need to tweak your reverbs to make them work in your sessions.

EQ is an invaluable tool for sculpting your reverb, and one I use almost every time. Side-chaining can also give you great results and dynamics in your reverbs, whether you use compression or gating. Finally, diffusion can create live-ness from aggressive reverbs and pre-delay can add some space between your reverb and your track.

All these tricks have multiple uses. Have you used any of these tricks? On what? Share it with us in the comments!

  • mikej

    Another simple tut, yet something that can overlooked. Well done!

  • SylvainB

    Thanks for your tutorial.

    We’d appreciate audio samples to hear how does it sounds.

    • http://www.audio-issues.com Björgvin
      Author

      Although I could, I just don’t think that will help your mixes at all. I’d rather you try it out on your own mixes to get a feel for how these tips work in your own songs. Someone might not be able to relate to a generic audio sample I attach, and therefore dismisses the techniques. Also, for delicate mixing tricks, the mp3 conversion just rips things apart sometimes. It’s hard to show a subtle technique when the mp3 compresses most of it out.

      Hey, just try it out. You’ll be glad you did :)

      • http://www.tricky-loops.de Tricky Loops

        I do not care if there are audio samples, but why I must always hear these horror stories about “mp3 compresses most of it out”? The most people listen to music with mp3 – and if you make a CD with 16 bit depth, there’s also some audio data lost compared to 24 or 32 bit production.

        A mp3 with a sample rate from 192 kbps upwards sounds nearly as good as the CD. And LP’s from yesterday, were they really better? Should we sell cassettes again because of the amazing audio quality? Or do you even want the grammophone back?

  • http://facebook.com/djerikmitchell Erik Mitchell

    This was very helpful, made some notes and will try some of these tricks on my studio session this weekend! Cheers

  • Hari

    Thank you so much for this… such simple tips.. but what an impact it can have.. thanks once again! Very well written!

  • http://www.audio-issues.com Björgvin
    Author

    I’m sorry to break it to you Tricky Loops, but you’re wrong on this one. An mp3 at 192 kbps has a compression ratio of 7:1, from a CD master. That’s a lot of compression and data lost. I’m not particularly knocking the mp3 format(I listen to a lot of my music in mp3s, and they’re from 192-320 kbps) but there is a major difference between CD format and an mp3.

    I’ve done testing multiple times and the sound doesn’t lie. A session inside a DAW, that’s in 44.1(or any other sample rate) at 24 bit sounds way better than an mp3 bounce of the same session.

    I don’t care that much about vinyls and cassettes, that’s really another topic, but mp3s and CDs are different. Especially when you’re showing a subtle technique that is hard to demonstrate when you’ve ripped all the subtleties out of it.

    • http://www.tricky-loops.de Tricky Loops

      I’ve said:

      “A mp3 with a sample rate from 192 kbps upwards sounds nearly as good as the CD.”

      That’s fact – even if the compression ratio is 1:7,4. Only a few people will perceive a difference, and this only in an optimal listening environment. More than 90 % of all people will never notice a difference.

      So if you make such a subtly effect that only max. 10 % of all the people can hear it, which sense would this make? Do you wanna write only music which you can hear under optimal circumstances in the studio?

      These horror stories are exaggerated. The mp3 don’t compresses most of it out, and you can perceive even a subtly effect on a mp3 (with higher sample rate). And if not, then the effect isn’t worth it, if you want to make music for ALL people, from the kitchen radio to the studio environment.

      • http://www.audio-issues.com Björgvin
        Author

        An mp3 only sounds as good as the original session it came from. If you don’t care about all the little subtleties that make that original mix sound good, then the mp3 won’t sound as good. But if you take care of your session, your mp3 will reflect that. It’s as simple as that.

      • http://www.tricky-loops.de Tricky Loops

        Of course I care about the subtleties of a track. But that wasn’t the question. You said that you can’t give audio samples because the mp3 destroys all the subtle effects. And that’s not true.

        Good music sounds good even in the kitchen radio. But bad music still sounds not better even with 100 subtle effects which you only can hear in the raw wave file if you put your expensive studio monitors on.

        And in order to exaggerate, many mixes sound even better without the 100 subtle effects, reverb tails and interfering frequencies which destroy more of the song than they contribute to them.

      • JJ

        “And in order to exaggerate, many mixes sound even better without the 100 subtle effects, reverb tails and interfering frequencies which destroy more of the song than they contribute to them.”

        Um, wasn’t that the purpose of the article? To provide techniques that would help you avoid those interfering reverb tails and frequencies?

        “Good music sounds good even in the kitchen radio.”
        Sure, a good song is a good song, and good production translates into a kitchen radio. But just as 2nd rate production can fall apart when played on a kitchen radio, or in a club, yet sound great on an audiophile system, the opposite is true as well: it can sound great on your kitchen radio but sound like crap on a high-end system. Personally I want my stuff to sound good in the car, kitchen, or wherever – because 90% of the time I’m one of those types of listeners. But you know what? It’s those 10% of people that really pay attention to subtleties and appreciate a well crafted soundstage that I’m hoping will appreciate my work… because I’m one of them, too.

      • http://www.tricky-loops.de Tricky Loops

        As I said before:

        A subtle effect that you only can hear with 2,000 $ studio monitors if you play the 32 bit wave file and not in a simple mp3 isn’t worth the effort. Unless you sell cd’s with 32 bit wave files and write on it: “suited only for professional audio equipment, special audio player needed”.

        Because as a listener I’d even be angry if I can’t hear the effect in my mp3 player and I have to spend 2,000 $ for pro studio monitors in order to hear that ultimate subtle effect.

        But now, stop, I don’t wanna argue forever: Believe it, or leave it! Make good music and if the people even dance to it listening to a 24 kbps mp3 or hearing the song from a beach bar in a distance of 2 miles, THAT is an great success!!

  • http://www.eversonk.com.br Everson K

    Tricky Loops, do as best as you can, with all the subtleties, and the end result will always be better. The diference beetween a good mix and an outstanding mix in on the details. AND, if you want to stand out as an artist or engeneer, you must impress those 10% of listeners who knows what they are listening to. They are the ones who will say you are good, and then the other 90% will believe them ;)
    Cheers!

    • http://www.tricky-loops.de Tricky Loops

      It’s better to impress the people with sounds they can hear than with sounds they can’t.

      It’s not true that mp3 were so bad that you can’t hear subtle effects. Do you as DJ really want to convince me that the party folk is hearing the subtle effects when they are dancing in the noisy crowd? Do you make studio environment parties with studio monitors and everybody is quiet, so that they can here all your subtle effects?? In every club and location is more noise than in the worst 24 kbps mp3!

      You can’t impress the other 10 % quality fanatics with mainstream dance music, even if you put 100 subtle effects in it!