How much do you know about micamps? Should technology guide your choices? Or maybe you’re happy to use whatever is around, but sometimes you’d like to have a more informed approach to recording? This tutorial will help you choose the colour you’re missing from your canvas.
Perfect Preamps
Micamps are a studio essential, and are likely to stay that way for a while. We might have ditched tape machines, passive speakers, even hard drives are going to become a thing of the past at this rate, but it’s still not possible to record acoustic music, or in fact any sound or noise, without a microphone. Although some digital microphones are beginning to appear on the market (see the Neumann Solution-D), the classic, analogue microphone is going to be with us for some time–and the micamp with it.

A tastefully populated rack of 8 API 512c modules. Classic micamps like these, originally designed to be fitted into a modular console, are often re-issued for rackmount use.
Microphones detect the smallest vibrations in the air or in a solid with clever mechanical devices–capsules, ribbons or pickups–but they are often not very efficient at translating it into a signal. To make matters worse, whatever they pick up is often sent down a few runs of long cables, through a number of connections, running over humming mains cables and finally into the back of the preamp. What are the chances for the original signal to survive such a hurdle?

Old leads and tarnished connectors can cripple a perfectly good sound source, and make it impossible for a micamp to extract any quality at the other end.
Micamps are not just dull boxes designed to turn the volume up–or at least, they shouldn’t be. Their primary task is to recover as much sound as possible from the microphone and make it intelligible. We often take it for granted that a microphone shouldn’t hum, buzz or crackle, but the reality is that this would almost inevitably happen if the pairing with the micamp was less than perfect.
Micamps can have an audio transformer on their input stage or they can have a transformerless design. The active gain element of a micamp can either be a tube, solid state or hybrid design. Solid state is a generic word that implies the use of transistors, whether they are integrated circuits, discrete FET or traditional type. Without getting into the electronic details of each technology, each of these design choices will affect the sound.
Vintage mic preamps
Vintage micamps were designed at a time when modern technology wasn’t available, and they all have transformer-isolated inputs. Really old ones also had tube circuitry, because transistors hadn’t been invented yet!
The classic sound they’re known for–big, warm and round are words often used to describe it–is a direct consequence of the components they’re made of. Audio transformers have a tendency to enhance the lower end of the audio spectrum and filter out the top end, and tubes are characterized by even harmonic distortion, which is more pleasing to the ear. On the other hand, because of their age, most vintage micamps are noisy and hissy, particularly at high gain settings. This is because old components, which are at the heart of the sound, couldn’t be manufactured to the same specification of their modern counterparts.
Modern re-issues
Modern re-issues of vintage microphones often incorporate slight modifications to the design to improve the noise floor without affecting the sound too much.

A rack of original Neve 33122 modules. First released in the 70s, these micamps (and countless variations on the theme) are still very popular for their warm sound.

Modern Neve 1081 reissue. Although closely matched to the specs of the original, their noise floor is much improved.
Modern mic preamps
Modern mic preamps offer a massive improvement over their vintage predecessors. Superior components and improved techniques can offer spectacular performance and amazing linearity.
Often quoting a dynamic range of 120dB or more, a ridiculous noise floor and an extended frequency response that can stretch way beyond 100KHz, modern micamps can not only capture the minutest nuances of a performance, but also show microphone defects otherwise unnoticeable. Some modern micamps offer more than one technology at the gain stage, as well as the option of switching a transformer into the input stage.

Pendulum Audio Quartet II: this micamp and channel strip is the engineer’s holy grail. The micamp offers a choice of 2 transformers on the input or none at all, and an increasingly popular choice of input impedances.

Some hand-made products (like this ) can easily beat the competition because of their custom components and rigorously selected parts.
Remember: cheap components can also mean cheap design. Micamps found on popular mixing consoles or budget channel strips are pretty basic and use standard integrated circuits, which barely deliver the goods at their best.

A cheap analogue console can’t compete with purpose-built micamps.
Conclusion
Different micamps offer different flavours. The most expensive ones will usually offer a better technical performance, and will make the most of needy vintage mics. Modern designs can offer a cleaner signal path, but sometimes might lack the oomph of older designs to privilege attention to detail and crispness.
Download the Play Pack for this article (11.6MB)
Contents:
- Bonus content: Neve 33122 module, SSL E-Series Micamp card, SSL G-Series micamp card.
- Printable PDF article.
- Hi-res images.

Thank you! I’m trying to compose my own music, and since the piano is digital, i don’t have to worry about having a mic. But other non digital instruments will require the good ol’ fashioned mic. There’s a lot of good reading here!
Well, come to think of it, a tut on how to set up, record and enhace an instrumental piece would be nice
When talking mic preamps, I can’t leave out one of my favorites which is the John Hardy M-2 (http://www.johnhardyco.com/M-2details.html), an extremely clean and transparent pre that is great for orchestra and voice recordings. It has an incredibly low noise floor and tons of headroom. Another old standby is the classic Neve 1073. I always need a small rack of these for most any rock groups I track.
I digged it for you. Thanks for the good articles, I am learning a lot.
I think it is confusing how you flip from “micamp” to “mic preamp”. There are also a number of places where a semi-colon would have made much more sense than a comma. This article almost seems like stream of consciousness without much structure beyond splitting up thoughts with images. I hope this doesn’t offend the author.
Really?
We’re calling Mackies “cheap” now. I’ll give you it’s no Allen & Heath, but really, “cheap”?
I could understand if you had a pic of some busted up Behringer or Alesis, but Mackies are pretty decent as mid range mixers go.
Preamps are an extremely important component to shaping a microphones sound. I guess I was just hoping for a little more comparison or explanation. What about modern preamps trying to attain vintage sounds like UA’s LA-610, or an Avalon 737? Or what about some of the newest digital modeling amps like the Focusrite Liquid? Any big sound budget amps to discuss like maybe the FMR Really Nice Pre?
So you’ve scratched the surface. What next?
When you have 16 mic pre’s in an $800 mixer, then as far as mic pre’s go, yes Mackie is cheap. Mackie’s mixers are decent, but their mic pre’s are garbage in comparison to those from companies like API and Neve.
thanks for the article, i have some old pre’s and was hoping for some info about
gain structure and sorting out between newer stuff with 10x ohm difference from
source and load and older stuff that matches-600Ω.